On Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 12:14 PM Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> However... I don't think I have the stomach to overhaul the allocators
> this late in the release. For this release I may opt to put the
> nonzero mask back in a tree, but have it always be set. The NULL ==
> -1 shortcut was very error pro
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 5:42 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
>
> On 10/4/22 11:14, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 4:34 PM Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> Am 04.10.2022 um 16:30 schrieb Aldy Hernandez :
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 3:27 PM Andrew MacLeod
> >>> wrote:
On 10/4/22 11:14, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 4:34 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
Am 04.10.2022 um 16:30 schrieb Aldy Hernandez :
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 3:27 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
On 10/4/22 08:13, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022, 13:28 Aldy H
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 4:34 PM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
>
>
> > Am 04.10.2022 um 16:30 schrieb Aldy Hernandez :
> >
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 3:27 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >>> On 10/4/22 08:13, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022, 13:28 Aldy Hernandez wr
> Am 04.10.2022 um 16:30 schrieb Aldy Hernandez :
>
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 3:27 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>>
>>
>>> On 10/4/22 08:13, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022, 13:28 Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>>>
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 9:55 AM Richard Biener
w
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 3:27 PM Andrew MacLeod wrote:
>
>
> On 10/4/22 08:13, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 4, 2022, 13:28 Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> >
> >> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 9:55 AM Richard Biener
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Am 04.10.2022 um 09:36 schrieb Aldy Hernandez via
On 10/4/22 08:13, Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022, 13:28 Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 9:55 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
Am 04.10.2022 um 09:36 schrieb Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches <
gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>:
The reason the nonzero mask was kept i
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022, 13:28 Aldy Hernandez wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 9:55 AM Richard Biener
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Am 04.10.2022 um 09:36 schrieb Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches <
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>:
> > >
> > > The reason the nonzero mask was kept in a tree was basically inertia,
> >
On Tue, Oct 4, 2022 at 9:55 AM Richard Biener
wrote:
>
>
> Am 04.10.2022 um 09:36 schrieb Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
> :
> >
> > The reason the nonzero mask was kept in a tree was basically inertia,
> > as everything in irange is a tree. However, there's no need to keep
> > it in a tree, as
Am 04.10.2022 um 09:36 schrieb Aldy Hernandez via Gcc-patches
:
>
> The reason the nonzero mask was kept in a tree was basically inertia,
> as everything in irange is a tree. However, there's no need to keep
> it in a tree, as the conversions to and from wide ints are very
> annoying. That,
The reason the nonzero mask was kept in a tree was basically inertia,
as everything in irange is a tree. However, there's no need to keep
it in a tree, as the conversions to and from wide ints are very
annoying. That, plus special casing NULL masks to be -1 is prone
to error.
I have not only rew
11 matches
Mail list logo