On 08/05/2013 12:52 AM, Adam Butcher wrote:
Hi Paolo,
On 03.08.2013 19:38, Paolo Carlini wrote:
.. I don't know if at this Stage we are paying attention to these
minor details, but at least Patch 1 and 3 appear to have some overlong
lines.
The patch set referenced by your mail has been superse
Hi Paolo,
On 03.08.2013 19:38, Paolo Carlini wrote:
.. I don't know if at this Stage we are paying attention to these
minor details, but at least Patch 1 and 3 appear to have some
overlong
lines.
The patch set referenced by your mail has been superseded (see [1] and
[2]). I think most of th
.. I don't know if at this Stage we are paying attention to these minor
details, but at least Patch 1 and 3 appear to have some overlong lines.
Thanks!
Paolo.
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:35 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
> Let's move all the lambda code into a new lambda.c, semantics.c has gotten
> huge.
Amen to that, brother!
-- Gaby
On 07/01/2013 04:26 PM, Adam Butcher wrote:
I've finally reworked the generic lambda patches I made back in 2009
(http://gcc.1065356.n5.nabble.com/lambda-Latest-experimental-polymorphic-lambda-patches-tt713016.html)
to apply against GCC's mainline.
Great!
Missing features:
- Conversion to
Hi all,
I've finally reworked the generic lambda patches I made back in 2009
(http://gcc.1065356.n5.nabble.com/lambda-Latest-experimental-polymorphic-lambda-patches-tt713016.html)
to apply against GCC's mainline.
The syntaxes demonstrated by the following examples are supported (as
per the previo
