On 10/18/2013 03:57 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
OK. I thought I had already approved this, but apparently not.
Thanks, applied.
Can I also ask you to follow up to this exchange which remained hanging?
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2013-10/msg00827.html
Thanks in advance!
Paolo.
OK. I thought I had already approved this, but apparently not.
Jason
Hi
On 10/13/2013 08:26 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
today I noticed that in cp_parser_lookup_name the code in the
object_type != NULL_TREE else can be tidied a bit and a
lookup_name_real often avoided. Tested x86_64-linux.
Can I apply this clean-up? It seems pretty straightforward to me,
ess
Hi,
today I noticed that in cp_parser_lookup_name the code in the
object_type != NULL_TREE else can be tidied a bit and a lookup_name_real
often avoided. Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
/
2013-10-14 Paolo Carlini
* parser.c (cp_parser_lookup_name): Tid
