Re: [C++ Patch] PR 58610

2014-03-01 Thread Jason Merrill
OK. Jason

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 58610

2014-03-01 Thread Paolo Carlini
... in fact, we can also imagine the below clean-up, for another DECL_DELETED_FN use and likewise for DECL_DECLARED_CONSTEXPR_P (which immediately applies STRIP_TEMPLATE to its argument) uses. Or for Stage 1, maybe? Thanks, Paolo. // 2014-03-01 Paolo Carlini * meth

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 58610

2014-02-28 Thread Paolo Carlini
On 02/28/2014 04:57 PM, Jason Merrill wrote: OK. Thanks. I'm going to commit as obvious the additional lambda.c hunk below, which removes another now redundant STRIP_TEMPLATE use. Thanks, Paolo. /cp 2014-02-28 Paolo Carlini PR c++/58610 * cp-tree.h (DE

Re: [C++ Patch] PR 58610

2014-02-28 Thread Jason Merrill
OK. Jason

[C++ Patch] PR 58610

2014-02-27 Thread Paolo Carlini
Hi, in this regression, we ICE in explain_non_literal_class in: if (DECL_DELETED_FN (fn)) maybe_explain_implicit_delete (fn); because fn is a TEMPLATE_DECL. Now, if I read the comment which provides rationale for LANG_DECL_FN_CHECK: /* We want to be able to check DECL_C