Jason,
H.J. figured out that this changed when case SCOPE_REF of
value_dependent_expression_p started always returning true, part of the
instantiation_dependent_p work...
I'm unassigning myself, I guess you will immediately see which further
changes are needed.
Thanks!
Paolo.
On 09/14/2012 05:14 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
lookup_field returns NULL_TREE and dependent_type_p (context) is
false. It seems to me that the return value of lookup_field is right.
No, I don't think it makes sense for lookup_field to return NULL_TREE.
For our testcase we should find the nested ty
Hi,
On 09/14/2012 04:36 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 09/14/2012 09:05 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
here we crash because strip_typedefs while processing _RequireInputIter
calls make_typename_type which returns error_mark_node (# line 3281).
strip_typedefs should not return error_mark_node unless i
On 09/14/2012 09:05 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
here we crash because strip_typedefs while processing _RequireInputIter
calls make_typename_type which returns error_mark_node (# line 3281).
strip_typedefs should not return error_mark_node unless it gets
error_mark_node as an argument; if a typede
Hi,
here we crash because strip_typedefs while processing _RequireInputIter
calls make_typename_type which returns error_mark_node (# line 3281).
Thus I'm simply checking for result == error_mark_node right after the
switch (in the switch finish_decltype_type could also return
error_mark_node
