On 12/30/2011 12:38 PM, Joseph S. Myers wrote:
In the absence of a resolution of a DR against C11 that allows alignof in
this case, I think we should continue to disallow it for C.
Ah, I didn't realize that C11 had alignof as well. OK, then.
Jason
On Fri, 30 Dec 2011, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 12/28/2011 07:07 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> > I think the resolution of core/930 and C++11 itself are pretty clear:
> > alignof of an array of unknown bound is fine, provided the element type
> > is complete of course.
>
> I think it makes sense for
Hi,
On 12/30/2011 06:27 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 12/28/2011 07:07 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I think the resolution of core/930 and C++11 itself are pretty clear:
alignof of an array of unknown bound is fine, provided the element type
is complete of course.
I think it makes sense for this chan
On 12/28/2011 07:07 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
I think the resolution of core/930 and C++11 itself are pretty clear:
alignof of an array of unknown bound is fine, provided the element type
is complete of course.
I think it makes sense for this change to apply to C as well, on the
same principle
Hi,
I think the resolution of core/930 and C++11 itself are pretty clear:
alignof of an array of unknown bound is fine, provided the element type
is complete of course.
Tested x86_64-linux.
Thanks,
Paolo.
//
/c-family
2011-12-29 Paolo Carlini
PR c++/51316
