On 06/12/2013 04:05 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
On 06/12/2013 03:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
OK, but please add a comment.
Thanks. I added this:
// cp_parser_lookup_name has the same diagnostic,
// thus make sure to emit it almost once.
As mentioned by Marc off-line,
On 06/12/2013 03:38 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
OK, but please add a comment.
Thanks. I added this:
// cp_parser_lookup_name has the same diagnostic,
// thus make sure to emit it almost once.
Paolo.
OK, but please add a comment.
Jason
Hi,
this issue, which originally was about spelling out in the error message
the ambiguous candidates, is by and large fixed. Only, we produce the
whole diagnostic twice for the testcase at issue: first in
cp_parser_lookup_name and then again in
cp_parser_nested_name_specifier_opt. The below
