Hi,
On 08/01/2014 08:30 PM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 07/31/2014 01:36 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
The problem is that when grokfndecl calls duplicate_decls in such
member cases it looks through TEMPLATE_DECLs
and then telling apart the two cases above is tough, both are
FUNCTION_DECLs
Ideas abou
On 07/31/2014 01:36 PM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
The problem is that when grokfndecl calls duplicate_decls in such member cases
it looks through TEMPLATE_DECLs
and then telling apart the two cases above is tough, both are FUNCTION_DECLs
Ideas about the best way to handle that?
Could you just cond
Hi,
today I noticed that when we implemented the resolution we failed to
handle static member functions. The below tested x86_64-linux.
While working on this I noticed that we don't use the
DECL_NONSTATIC_MEMBER_FUNCTION_P macro much, should we apply something
like the attached?
Finally, i
