OK, thanks.
On Wed, Nov 14, 2018 at 7:12 AM Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> This paper from what I can see mostly just codifies our
> implementation-defined behavior as standard (two's complement as the only
> possible representation of signed integers, but still keeping UB signed
> integer overf
Hi!
This paper from what I can see mostly just codifies our
implementation-defined behavior as standard (two's complement as the only
possible representation of signed integers, but still keeping UB signed
integer overflows), the only changes I found that IMHO need changing
in GCC are that left sh