OK for trunk and 6.
On Thu, Aug 11, 2016 at 10:55 AM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> As mentioned in the PR, constexpr.c has been handling cases with ranges
> just as the lowest value of the range.
>
> Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for
> trunk? What abou
Hi!
As mentioned in the PR, constexpr.c has been handling cases with ranges
just as the lowest value of the range.
Fixed thusly, bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for
trunk? What about 6.2 (not a regression, but low risk fix for wrong-code)?
2016-08-11 Jakub Jelinek
