On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:11:24AM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 23/05/19 00:04, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:00:22AM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On 22/05/19 23:45, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > I noticed this test fails since r271492. Proba
Hi,
On 23/05/19 00:04, Marek Polacek wrote:
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:00:22AM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
Hi,
On 22/05/19 23:45, Marek Polacek wrote:
I noticed this test fails since r271492. Probably obvious, but...
Tested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
I was wondering why I didn't notice
On Thu, May 23, 2019 at 12:00:22AM +0200, Paolo Carlini wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 22/05/19 23:45, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > I noticed this test fails since r271492. Probably obvious, but...
> >
> > Tested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
>
> I was wondering why I didn't notice it... It's because it only
Hi,
On 22/05/19 23:45, Marek Polacek wrote:
I noticed this test fails since r271492. Probably obvious, but...
Tested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
I was wondering why I didn't notice it... It's because it only fails
with check-c++-all not with check-c++. Anyway, it seems obvious to me
too
I noticed this test fails since r271492. Probably obvious, but...
Tested on x86_64-linux, ok for trunk?
2019-05-22 Marek Polacek
* g++.dg/cpp1y/udlit-char-template-neg.C: Expect the error on a
different line. Check the column number too.
diff --git gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1
