Re: [C++ PATCH] Fix postfix-expression parsing (PR c++/78089, take 2)

OK.

[C++ PATCH] Fix postfix-expression parsing (PR c++/78089, take 2)

Hi! On Mon, Oct 24, 2016 at 04:20:25PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > While writing a testcase for __builtin_launder, I've noticed we don't parse > __builtin_shuffle or __builtin_addressof properly (as well as do error > recovery e.g. for typeid in constant expression etc.). > > The problem is tha

[C++ PATCH] Fix postfix-expression parsing (PR c++/78089)

Hi! While writing a testcase for __builtin_launder, I've noticed we don't parse __builtin_shuffle or __builtin_addressof properly (as well as do error recovery e.g. for typeid in constant expression etc.). The problem is that several spots would return something; from the first switch in cp_parse