Fix ARM bootstrap failure due to an odd warning:
/src/gcc/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c: In function 'rtx_def*
arm_expand_builtin(tree, rtx, rtx, machine_mode, int)':
/src/gcc/gcc/config/arm/arm-builtins.c:3056:46: error: type qualifiers ignored
on cast result type [-Werror=ignored-qualifiers]
On 15/09/15 15:59, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> After Marek's patch I see the bootstrap failure on arm:
> gcc/config/arm/arm.c:4601:46: error: left shift of negative value
> [-Werror=shift-negative-value]
> && (val & (-1 << (32 - set_sign_bit_copies))) == val)
>
> I believe this is th
Hi all,
After Marek's patch I see the bootstrap failure on arm:
gcc/config/arm/arm.c:4601:46: error: left shift of negative value
[-Werror=shift-negative-value]
&& (val & (-1 << (32 - set_sign_bit_copies))) == val)
I believe this is the right fix. Change -1 to HOST_WIDE_INT_M1U and change
On 15/05/15 07:41, Kugan wrote:
Hi Richard,
r223090 seem to miss a parenthesis and seem to be causing:
from ../../widen/gcc/fold-const.c:46:
../../widen/gcc/fold-const.c: In function 'tree_node*
fold_range_test(location_t, tree_code, tree, tree, tree)':
../../widen/gcc/confi
On 15/05/15 07:46, Kugan wrote:
Sorry, this is not the right fix. Looking at it.
Hi Kugan,
FWIW, I'm seeing this bootstrap failure as well.
If you have a patch for this, it would be appreciated.
Kyrill
Thanks,
Kugan
On 15/05/15 16:41, Kugan wrote:
Hi Richard,
r223090 seem to miss a pare
Sorry, this is not the right fix. Looking at it.
Thanks,
Kugan
On 15/05/15 16:41, Kugan wrote:
> Hi Richard,
>
> r223090 seem to miss a parenthesis and seem to be causing:
>
> from ../../widen/gcc/fold-const.c:46:
> ../../widen/gcc/fold-const.c: In function 'tree_node*
> fold_r
Hi Richard,
r223090 seem to miss a parenthesis and seem to be causing:
from ../../widen/gcc/fold-const.c:46:
../../widen/gcc/fold-const.c: In function 'tree_node*
fold_range_test(location_t, tree_code, tree, tree, tree)':
../../widen/gcc/config/arm/arm.h:2068:4: error: enumeral a
