Hi Prathamesh,
> -Original Message-
> From: Prathamesh Kulkarni
> Sent: 29 June 2021 08:22
> To: gcc Patches
> Cc: Kyrylo Tkachov
> Subject: Re: [ARM] PR66791: Replace calls to builtin in vmul_n (a, b)
> intrinsics
> with __a * __b
>
> On Mon, 21
On Mon, 21 Jun 2021 at 14:04, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 13:27, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 12:45, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 16:01, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 31 May 2
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021 at 13:27, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 12:45, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 16:01, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 15:22, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 26 May 2
On Mon, 7 Jun 2021 at 12:45, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 16:01, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 15:22, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 14:07, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Wed, 26 May 2021, Prathames
On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 16:01, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 15:22, Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 14:07, Marc Glisse wrote:
> > >
> > > On Wed, 26 May 2021, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches wrote:
> > >
> > > > The attached patch removes ca
On Mon, 31 May 2021 at 15:22, Prathamesh Kulkarni
wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 14:07, Marc Glisse wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, 26 May 2021, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches wrote:
> >
> > > The attached patch removes calls to builtins in vmul_n* (a, b) with __a *
> > > __b.
> >
> > I am not fa
On Wed, 26 May 2021 at 14:07, Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> On Wed, 26 May 2021, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches wrote:
>
> > The attached patch removes calls to builtins in vmul_n* (a, b) with __a *
> > __b.
>
> I am not familiar with neon, but are __a and __b unsigned here? Otherwise,
> is vmul_n
On Wed, 26 May 2021, Prathamesh Kulkarni via Gcc-patches wrote:
The attached patch removes calls to builtins in vmul_n* (a, b) with __a * __b.
I am not familiar with neon, but are __a and __b unsigned here? Otherwise,
is vmul_n already undefined in case of overflow?
--
Marc Glisse
Hi,
The attached patch removes calls to builtins in vmul_n* (a, b) with __a * __b.
For float variants, it gates multiplication on __FAST_MATH__.
Since we are not removing all calls to builtins, I am not sure if we
should remove
entry for vmul_n from arm_neon_builtins.def ?
Testing the patch showed
