Re: [ARM, AArch64] Make aarch64-common.c files more robust.

2013-10-01 Thread Richard Earnshaw
On 30/09/13 09:52, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > Hi, > > Recently I've found myself getting a number of segfaults from > code calling in to the arm_early_load/alu_dep functions in > aarch64-common.c. These functions expect a particular form > for the RTX patterns they work over, but some of them do

Re: [ARM, AArch64] Make aarch64-common.c files more robust.

2013-09-30 Thread Marcus Shawcroft
On 30 September 2013 09:52, James Greenhalgh wrote: > > Hi, > > aarch64-common.c. These functions expect a particular form You meant aarch-common.c here and in the title ;-) This is fine by me, but as a config/arm/ change needs OK from Ramana or Richard. /Marcus > 2013-09-30 James Greenhalgh

[ARM, AArch64] Make aarch64-common.c files more robust.

2013-09-30 Thread James Greenhalgh
Hi, Recently I've found myself getting a number of segfaults from code calling in to the arm_early_load/alu_dep functions in aarch64-common.c. These functions expect a particular form for the RTX patterns they work over, but some of them do not validate this form. This patch fixes that, removing