Jiong Wang writes:
> On 07/07/16 10:34, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>>
>> To make backporting easier, could you please write a very simple
>> standalone test that exposes this bug, and submit this patch with just
>> that simple test? I've already OKed the functional part of this patch, and
>> I'm hap
On 07/07/16 10:34, James Greenhalgh wrote:
To make backporting easier, could you please write a very simple
standalone test that exposes this bug, and submit this patch with just
that simple test? I've already OKed the functional part of this patch, and
I'm happy to pre-approve a simple testcase
On 07/07/16 15:13, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 7 July 2016 at 14:54, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 07/07/16 12:36, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 7 July 2016 at 11:16, Jiong Wang wrote:
I was using dg-xfail-if, (the description is still using "marked as
XFAIL"...),
but later found it's actually broken u
On 7 July 2016 at 14:54, Jiong Wang wrote:
>
>
> On 07/07/16 12:36, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> On 7 July 2016 at 11:16, Jiong Wang wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> I was using dg-xfail-if, (the description is still using "marked as
>>> XFAIL"...),
>>> but later found it's actually broken under advsimd-intrin
On 07/07/16 12:36, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 7 July 2016 at 11:16, Jiong Wang wrote:
I was using dg-xfail-if, (the description is still using "marked as
XFAIL"...),
but later found it's actually broken under advsimd-intrinsics, UNRESOLVEDs
are
given at the same time instead of clean XFAIL, I
On 7 July 2016 at 11:16, Jiong Wang wrote:
> On 06/07/16 16:55, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> On 6 July 2016 at 17:44, Kyrill Tkachov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/07/16 16:29, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
>
> T
On 7 July 2016 at 11:16, Jiong Wang wrote:
> On 06/07/16 16:55, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>>
>> On 6 July 2016 at 17:44, Kyrill Tkachov
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>>
>>> On 06/07/16 16:29, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
>
> T
On Thu, Jul 07, 2016 at 10:16:31AM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
> I was using dg-xfail-if, (the description is still using "marked as
> XFAIL"...),
> but later found it's actually broken under advsimd-intrinsics,
> UNRESOLVEDs are
> given at the same time instead of clean XFAIL, I suspect those dg-do-w
On 06/07/16 16:55, Christophe Lyon wrote:
On 6 July 2016 at 17:44, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
Hi all,
On 06/07/16 16:29, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
The current vmaxnm/vminnm float intrinsics are implemented using
__builtin_aarch64_smax/min
On 6 July 2016 at 17:44, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> Hi all,
>
>
> On 06/07/16 16:29, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
>>>
>>> The current vmaxnm/vminnm float intrinsics are implemented using
>>> __builtin_aarch64_smax/min which are mapping to
Hi all,
On 06/07/16 16:29, James Greenhalgh wrote:
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
The current vmaxnm/vminnm float intrinsics are implemented using
__builtin_aarch64_smax/min which are mapping to backend patterns
using smin/smax rtl operators. However as documented
On 6 July 2016 at 17:29, James Greenhalgh wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
>> The current vmaxnm/vminnm float intrinsics are implemented using
>> __builtin_aarch64_smax/min which are mapping to backend patterns
>> using smin/smax rtl operators. However as docu
On Wed, Jul 06, 2016 at 02:11:51PM +0100, Jiong Wang wrote:
> The current vmaxnm/vminnm float intrinsics are implemented using
> __builtin_aarch64_smax/min which are mapping to backend patterns
> using smin/smax rtl operators. However as documented in rtl.def
>
> "Further, if both operands are
The current vmaxnm/vminnm float intrinsics are implemented using
__builtin_aarch64_smax/min which are mapping to backend patterns
using smin/smax rtl operators. However as documented in rtl.def
"Further, if both operands are zeros, or if either operand is NaN, then
it is unspecified which o
14 matches
Mail list logo
