On Fri, Aug 03, 2018 at 10:34:37AM -0500, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> The "@" handling broke -mlow-precision-div, because the scalar forms of
> the instruction were provided by a pattern that also provided FRECPX
> (and so were parameterised on an unspec code as well as a mode),
> while the SIMD ver
The "@" handling broke -mlow-precision-div, because the scalar forms of
the instruction were provided by a pattern that also provided FRECPX
(and so were parameterised on an unspec code as well as a mode),
while the SIMD versions had a dedicated FRECPE pattern. This patch
moves the scalar FRECPE h
