On Thu, 2 Apr 2020 at 04:34, Pop, Sebastian wrote:
>
> I have also seen this error in tsan.
> The fix is
> https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=ea376dd471a3b006bc48945c1d9a29408ab17a04
> "Fix shrinkwrapping interactions with atomics (PR92692)".
> This fix got committed as the last patch
I have also seen this error in tsan.
The fix is
https://gcc.gnu.org/git/?p=gcc.git;a=commit;h=ea376dd471a3b006bc48945c1d9a29408ab17a04
"Fix shrinkwrapping interactions with atomics (PR92692)".
This fix got committed as the last patch in the series.
Sebastian
On 4/1/20, 5:13 PM, "Christophe Lyon
On Wed, 25 Mar 2020 at 01:24, Pop, Sebastian via Gcc-patches
wrote:
>
> Hi Kyrill,
>
> Thanks for pointing out the two missing bug fixes.
> Please see attached all the back-ported patches.
> All the patches from trunk applied cleanly with no conflicts (except for the
> ChangeLog files) to the gcc
Thanks Jakub and Kyrill to point that out.
We will create a new branch called gcc-7-aarch64-outline-atomics or so with the
back-ported patches.
Sebastian
On 4/1/20, 9:36 AM, "Jakub Jelinek" wrote:
CAUTION: This email originated from outside of the organization. Do not
click links or open
On Wed, Apr 01, 2020 at 02:32:03PM +, Pop, Sebastian via Gcc-patches wrote:
> Thanks Kyrill! I will be happy to test the gcc-8 back-port of the patches.
Note, I have another fix, PR94435, that I've already bootstrapped and am
regtesting ATM, that will need to be included in any backports too
Hi Sebastian,
> -Original Message-
> From: Pop, Sebastian
> Sent: 01 April 2020 15:32
> To: Kyrylo Tkachov
> Cc: Wilco Dijkstra ; richard.hender...@linaro.org;
> gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: [AArch64] Backporting -moutline-atomics to gcc 9.x and 8.x
>
--
> From: Kyrylo Tkachov
> Sent: 01 April 2020 15:23
> To: Pop, Sebastian
> Cc: Wilco Dijkstra ; richard.hender...@linaro.org
> Subject: RE: [AArch64] Backporting -moutline-atomics to gcc 9.x and 8.x
>
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> > -
Adding gcc-patches as I had somehow deleted it from the addresses...
> -Original Message-
> From: Kyrylo Tkachov
> Sent: 01 April 2020 15:23
> To: Pop, Sebastian
> Cc: Wilco Dijkstra ; richard.hender...@linaro.org
> Subject: RE: [AArch64] Backporting -moutline-atomics
Ping, can we have the -moutline-atomics patches committed to the gcc-9 branch?
Thanks,
Sebastian
On 3/24/20, 7:24 PM, "Pop, Sebastian" wrote:
Hi Kyrill,
Thanks for pointing out the two missing bug fixes.
Please see attached all the back-ported patches.
All the patches fro
Hi Kyrill,
Thanks for pointing out the two missing bug fixes.
Please see attached all the back-ported patches.
All the patches from trunk applied cleanly with no conflicts (except for the
ChangeLog files) to the gcc-9 branch.
An up to date gcc-9 branch on which I applied the attached patches has
Hi Sebastian,
On 3/9/20 9:47 PM, Pop, Sebastian wrote:
Hi,
Please see attached the patches to add -moutline-atomics to the gcc-9 branch.
Tested on graviton2 aarch64-linux with bootstrap and
`make check` passes with no new fails.
Tested `make check` on glibc built with gcc-9 with and without
"-
Hi,
Please see attached the patches to add -moutline-atomics to the gcc-9 branch.
Tested on graviton2 aarch64-linux with bootstrap and
`make check` passes with no new fails.
Tested `make check` on glibc built with gcc-9 with and without
"-moutline-atomics"
and CFLAGS=" -O2 -g -fno-stack-protector
12 matches
Mail list logo
