On 2013-04-25 09:18, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Yes, this patch will work up to building libstdc++, where it will fail
with the same reason on movqi pattern (on non-BWX target). I suspect
that QImode access is generated during LRA (where reload_in_progress
is false!) and it directly generates movqi, whic
On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Chung-Ju Wu wrote:
>> * config/alpha/alpha.c (TARGET_LRA_P): New define.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and regression tested [1] on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu.
>>
>> OK for 4.9?
>>
>
> Yep.
Unfortunately, alphas are m
2013/4/23 Vladimir Makarov :
> On 13-04-22 2:19 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
>>
>> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/22/2013 11:17 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Richard Henderson
wrote:
>
> On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros Bi
2013/4/23 Steven Bosscher :
> On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> On 04/22/2013 11:17 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>>
>>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Richard Henderson
>>> wrote:
On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>
>
> 2013-01-28 Uros Bizjak
>
>
On 13-04-22 3:35 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
I never tried alpha with LRA. So it is not assumed that LRA should work on
alpha. But I am sure LRA can work for alpha if some efforts will be spent.
Porting LRA to a new target always involves ch
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 9:17 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
>
> I never tried alpha with LRA. So it is not assumed that LRA should work on
> alpha. But I am sure LRA can work for alpha if some efforts will be spent.
> Porting LRA to a new target always involves changes in .md and
> machine-dependen
On 13-04-22 2:19 PM, Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 04/22/2013 11:17 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Richard Henderson
wrote:
On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2013-01-28 Uros Bizjak
* config/alpha/alp
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 04/22/2013 11:17 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Richard Henderson
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2013-01-28 Uros Bizjak
* config/alpha/alpha.c (TAR
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 7:33 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>> Unfortunately, alphas are much more tied to reload than it was hoped.
>> While latest alphas (with FIX and BWX ISAs) survived transition to LRA
>> without problems, further testing on ev4 and ev5 triggered various
>> problems, one of them is PR5
On 04/22/2013 11:17 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2013-01-28 Uros Bizjak
* config/alpha/alpha.c (TARGET_LRA_P): New define.
Bootstrapped and regression tested [1] on alphaev68-unknown-li
On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 12:34 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
> On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
>>
>> 2013-01-28 Uros Bizjak
>>
>> * config/alpha/alpha.c (TARGET_LRA_P): New define.
>>
>> Bootstrapped and regression tested [1] on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu.
>>
>> OK for 4.9?
>>
>
On 01/28/2013 04:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
Hello!
2013-01-28 Uros Bizjak
* config/alpha/alpha.c (TARGET_LRA_P): New define.
Bootstrapped and regression tested [1] on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for 4.9?
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-01/msg02998.html
Can you a
On 01/28/2013 03:14 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
2013-01-28 Uros Bizjak
* config/alpha/alpha.c (TARGET_LRA_P): New define.
Bootstrapped and regression tested [1] on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for 4.9?
Yep.
r~
Hello!
2013-01-28 Uros Bizjak
* config/alpha/alpha.c (TARGET_LRA_P): New define.
Bootstrapped and regression tested [1] on alphaev68-unknown-linux-gnu.
OK for 4.9?
[1] http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-testresults/2013-01/msg02998.html
Uros.
Index: config/alpha/alpha.c
===
14 matches
Mail list logo
