Re: [4/4] Use scan-tree-dump instead of scan-tree-dump-times for some vect tests

On Mon, Nov 4, 2019 at 4:30 PM Richard Sandiford wrote: > > With later patches, we're able to vectorise the epilogues of these tests > on AArch64 and so get two instances of "vectorizing stmts using SLP". > Although it would be possible with a bit of effort to predict when > this happens, it doesn

[4/4] Use scan-tree-dump instead of scan-tree-dump-times for some vect tests

With later patches, we're able to vectorise the epilogues of these tests on AArch64 and so get two instances of "vectorizing stmts using SLP". Although it would be possible with a bit of effort to predict when this happens, it doesn't seem important whether we get 1 vs. 2 occurrences. All that mat