On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:28 AM, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> A debug insn after the final jump of a basic block may cause the
> expander to emit a dummy move where the non-debug compile won't
> because it finds the jump insn at the end of the insn stream.
>
> Fix the condition so that, instead of requ
On Jan 3, 2017, Richard Sandiford wrote:
>>&& (last = get_last_insn ())
>> - && JUMP_P (last))
>> + && (JUMP_P (last)
>> + || (DEBUG_INSN_P (last)
>> + && JUMP_P (prev_nondebug_insn (last)
> Would it be worth adding a get_last_nondebug_insn in case other patt
Alexandre Oliva writes:
> A debug insn after the final jump of a basic block may cause the
> expander to emit a dummy move where the non-debug compile won't
> because it finds the jump insn at the end of the insn stream.
>
> Fix the condition so that, instead of requiring the jump as the last
> in
A debug insn after the final jump of a basic block may cause the
expander to emit a dummy move where the non-debug compile won't
because it finds the jump insn at the end of the insn stream.
Fix the condition so that, instead of requiring the jump as the last
insn, it also matches a jump followed
