Re: [committed] Get avr building again

2021-05-06 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches
Jeff Law via Gcc-patches writes: > Removes references to CC_STATUS_INIT from the avr port, which should get > it to the point of building again. > > > Committed to the trunk. Thanks, I was about to send a patch for that. Regards Senthil > > > Jeff

Re: [Ping, PATCH 2/n] AVR CC0 conversion - adjust peepholes

2021-04-29 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches
Could someone please approve this patch too? The base conversion patch (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568658.html) was approved and committed, and fixing peepholes addresses a bunch of code size regressions introduced by the base patch. No regressions on all 4 devices, as

Re: [Ping] AVR CC0 conversion

2021-04-28 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes: > On 4/28/21 7:59 PM, Senthil Kumar Selvaraj wrote: OK for trunk. >>> >>> Anything else that keeps us from merging the changes? Would be great to >>> have the last backend besides CR-16 finally converted to MODE_CC on trunk. >> >> Nope. Committed and pushed

Re: [Ping] AVR CC0 conversion

2021-04-28 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches
John Paul Adrian Glaubitz writes: > Hi Senthil! > >> On Mon, Apr 26, 2021 at 9:20 AM Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches >> wrote: >>> >>> Hi, >>> >>> This is >>> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/563638.

[Ping, PATCH 2/n] AVR CC0 conversion - adjust peepholes

2021-04-25 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches
Applies cleanly on rebased version of previous patch (https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-April/568658.html). Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes: > Hi, > > This patch, to be applied on top of > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/563638.html, > adjusts peepholes to matc

[PATCH 2/n] AVR CC0 conversion - adjust peepholes

2021-01-18 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches
Hi, This patch, to be applied on top of https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-January/563638.html, adjusts peepholes to match and generate parallels with a clobber of REG_CC. It also sets mov_insn as the name of the pattern for the split insn (rather than the define_insn_and_split), so t

Re: [PATCH] avr: cc0 to mode_cc conversion

2021-01-05 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches
Senthil Kumar Selvaraj writes: > Georg-Johann Lay writes: > >> >> Finally, some general remarks: > > The work on my github branch was not complete - I'd blindly followed > whatever the CC0 Transition wiki mentioned (the first three steps of > case #2), and fixed any regression fallout (for ATmeg

Re: [PATCH] emit-rtl.c: Allow splitting of RTX_FRAME_RELATED_P insns?

2020-08-13 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches
Richard Sandiford writes: > Senthil Kumar via Gcc-patches writes: >> Hi, >> >> I'm working on converting the AVR backend to MODE_CC, following >> the steps described for case #2 in the CC0 transition wiki page, >> and I've implemented the first three bullet >> points (https://github.com

[Committed] Update email address

2020-08-12 Thread Senthil Kumar Selvaraj via Gcc-patches
This patch updates my email address in the MAINTAINERS file 2020-08-12 Senthil Kumar Selvaraj * MAINTAINERS: Update my email address. diff --git MAINTAINERS MAINTAINERS index 0b825c7ea6d..217ec9c9eca 100644 --- MAINTAINERS +++ MAINTAINERS @@ -588,7 +588,7 @@ Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus