Re: [PATCH v15] ada: fix timeval timespec on 32 bits archs with 64 bits time_t [PR114065]

2025-04-13 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
-all-timeval-and-timespec-definitions-and-c.patch 2025-04-13 19:09:48.932492634 +0200 @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ -From 29fa6493e708fd44af9cfb0197d146c13221c0b8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From a3ecab71b8dbdf79055c1e9a9124e40636ad1355 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Nicolas Boulenguez -Date: Tue, 23 Apr 2024 08:37

Re: [PATCH v13] ada: fix timeval timespec on 32 bits archs with 64 bits time_t [PR114065]

2024-11-21 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
Hello. I have rebased the patches on gcc-15. The new v13 and a diff between v12 are available at PR114065. The merge of commit 093894adbdf0638a494257bfe4bc42eb7ad13f6b Subject: ada: GNAT Calendar Support for 64-bit Unix Time Author: Douglas B Rupp 2024-10-09 21:44:16 Validator: Marc Pou

Re: [PATCH v11] ada: fix timeval timespec on 32 bits archs with 64 bits time_t [PR114065]

2024-10-17 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
> > > It may be surprising to have the RTEMS file used by other OS. The > > > original comment should have mentionned that in the first place, but > > > the file was only used with RTEMS. With your change, the file is > > > effectively shared, so it would be best to rename it. > > > > Could you pl

Re: [Ada] Fix PR ada/99264

2021-03-15 Thread Nicolas Boulenguez
> The change is supposed to be binary compatible so not sure what this > means. Our problem is related with distribution, not with a specific library or its ABI. Imagine that: $VENDOR1 builds GNAT without the fix. $VENDOR2 builds libfoo against GNAT. $administrator installs both. I write bar.ad