Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Minimal support for Zimop extension.

2024-08-07 Thread Nelson Chu
Hi Nick, Done for cherry-picking two patches to support riscv zimop and zcmop into binutils-2_43-branch. Commit bb566d7f, RISC-V: Add support for Zcmop extension Commit 305fe5ed, RISC-V: Add support for Zimop extension And also for gas/NEWS in the trunk, moved the entry into 2.43 section due to t

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Minimal support for Zimop extension.

2024-08-06 Thread Nelson Chu
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 9:35 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 8/6/24 3:31 AM, Nick Clifton wrote: > > Hi Jeff, > > > >>> 2.43 was released over an weekend. Is it possible to let it be > >>> supported after 2.44? cc Nick and jan. > >> I don't think it's critical enough to backport to 2.43. I'd just pu

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Minimal support for Zimop extension.

2024-08-05 Thread Nelson Chu
On Tue, Aug 6, 2024 at 11:17 AM Jeff Law wrote: > > On 8/5/24 8:17 PM, Nelson Chu wrote: > > 2.43 was released over an weekend. Is it possible to let it be > > supported after 2.44? cc Nick and jan. > I don't think it's critical enough to backport to 2.43. I&

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Minimal support for Zimop extension.

2024-08-05 Thread Nelson Chu
2.43 was released over an weekend. Is it possible to let it be supported after 2.44? cc Nick and jan. Thanks Nelson On Mon, Aug 5, 2024 at 11:24 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 8/5/24 9:21 AM, Jiawei wrote: > > > > > Thanks Jeff! I think I do not have the permissions in the binutils repo, > > let

[PATCH] RISC-V: jal cannot refer to a default visibility symbol for shared object.

2021-11-29 Thread Nelson Chu
This is the original binutils bugzilla report, https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28509 And this is the first version of the proposed binutils patch, https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-November/118398.html After applying the binutils patch, I get the the unexpected error

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Enable riscv attributes by default for all riscv targets.

2021-06-03 Thread Nelson Chu
On Fri, Jun 4, 2021 at 5:20 AM Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > On Thu, 03 Jun 2021 13:55:40 PDT (-0700), Jim Wilson wrote: > > These were only enabled for embedded elf originally because that was > > the safe option, and linux had no obvious use for them. But now that > > we have new extensions coming

Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Enable ifunc if it was supported in the binutils for linux toolchain.

2020-11-12 Thread Nelson Chu
On Fri, Nov 13, 2020 at 5:50 AM Jim Wilson wrote: >I committed and pushed it. Thanks for your help!! > I see some extra ifunc related testsuite failures, but that is because we > don't have the glibc ifunc patches upstream yet. It will be important to get > those done next. Yeah, hope we can

[PATCH] RISC-V: Enable ifunc if it was supported in the binutils for linux toolchain.

2020-11-10 Thread Nelson Chu
gcc/ * configure: Regenerated. * configure.ac: If ifunc was supported in the binutils for linux toolchain, then set enable_gnu_indirect_function to yes. --- gcc/configure| 37 + gcc/configure.ac | 35 ++