ed. Likewise, we would be covered if wanted to
change bases implementation in the future to return an associative
container. For example, if using size::type>>::value to
count the number of occurrences of A as a base class of E turns out to
be useful).
Thanks,
Mike
On 9/28/2011 6:54 A
Don't worry, I'm not suggesting including boost::mpl at all, just
leaving the return type of the bases trait unspecified. IMO, your
example illustrates my point that without performance tuning, compiling
metaprograms can be prohibitively expensive, so I want to avoid running
the tuple metaprogr
This patch consists intrinsics to properly create the bases and
direct_bases of a class in the correct order (including multiple nested
ambiguous virtual and non-virtual classes) for N2965
(http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2009/n2965.html).
This allows you to create type trait
