Re: Move -Wmaybe-uninitialized to -Wextra

2019-11-26 Thread Michael Witten
thrown out after they have been used to good effect by `-Wmaybe-uninitialized'. The Code generation, etc., shall be performed at the optimization level the user specified (namely, `-Og' in this case). In other words, save the user from gcc's foibles, but l

Re: [PATCH 1/4] Docs: extend.texi: Add missing semicolon for consistency

2015-04-11 Thread Michael Witten
On Wed, 8 Apr 2015 21:13:10 +0200 (CEST), Gerald Pfeifer wrote: > On Wed, 27 Apr 2011, Michael Witten wrote: >> --- >> trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi |2 +- >> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) >> >> diff --git a/trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/t

Re: [google] Linker plugin to do function reordering using callgraph edge profiles (issue5124041)

2011-09-24 Thread Michael Witten
On Sat, 24 Sep 2011 10:00:37 -0400, Diego Novillo wrote: > On 11-09-24 09:37 , Michael Witten wrote: >>> Re: [google] Linker plugin to do function reordering... >> >> Is there a particularly good reason for why you guys >> slip `[google]' into all of your `

Re: [google] Linker plugin to do function reordering using callgraph edge profiles (issue5124041)

2011-09-24 Thread Michael Witten
> Re: [google] Linker plugin to do function reordering... Is there a particularly good reason for why you guys slip `[google]' into all of your `Subject:' lines? I was under the impresions that this list is for work on GCC. Consider putting something germane in the brackets instead.

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-06-30 Thread Michael Witten
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:20, Michael Witten wrote: > See the following emails for a few inlined patches > to /trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi (revision 172911): > > [1] Docs: extend.texi: Add missing semicolon for consistency > [2] Docs: extend.texi: Remove trailing blanks from li

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-06-27 Thread Michael Witten
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:20, Michael Witten wrote: > See the following emails for a few inlined patches > to /trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi (revision 172911): > > [1] Docs: extend.texi: Add missing semicolon for consistency > [2] Docs: extend.texi: Remove trailing blanks from li

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-06-22 Thread Michael Witten
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:20, Michael Witten wrote: > See the following emails for a few inlined patches > to /trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi (revision 172911): > > [1] Docs: extend.texi: Add missing semicolon for consistency > [2] Docs: extend.texi: Remove trailing blanks from li

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-06-20 Thread Michael Witten
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:20, Michael Witten wrote: > See the following emails for a few inlined patches > to /trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi (revision 172911): > > [1] Docs: extend.texi: Add missing semicolon for consistency > [2] Docs: extend.texi: Remove trailing blanks from li

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-06-09 Thread Michael Witten
On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:20, Michael Witten wrote: > See the following emails for a few inlined patches > to /trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi (revision 172911): > > [1] Docs: extend.texi: Add missing semicolon for consistency > [2] Docs: extend.texi: Remove trailing blanks from li

Re: [PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-05-20 Thread Michael Witten
Message On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 01:20, Michael Witten wrote: > See the following emails for a few inlined patches > to /trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi (revision 172911): > >  [1] Docs: extend.texi: Add missing semicolon for consistency >  [2] Docs: extend.texi: Remove trailing blanks f

Re: [PATCH 2/4] Docs: extend.texi: Remove trailing blanks from lines

2011-05-05 Thread Michael Witten
On Thu, May 5, 2011 at 09:32, Richard Guenther wrote: > And yes, in "harm" I mostly refer to svn blame annoyances and to > patch/branch merge conflicts where context that causes the conflict > only changed in whitespace. Your tools are limiting the quality of your work. Are we not the toolmakers

Re: [PATCH 2/4] Docs: extend.texi: Remove trailing blanks from lines

2011-05-03 Thread Michael Witten
e indicates otherwise, I believe this patch is > rejected. To what do we owe this tradition other than laziness? Shall I match the mindlessness of this rule by introducing a variant patch that also alters non-whitespace on the offending lines? Sincerely, Michael Witten

[PATCH 4/4] Docs: extend.texi: Reword and rearrange attribute node introductions

2011-04-27 Thread Michael Witten
The rearrangement performed in the previous patch left the text in somewhat of an inconsistent state in terms of the flow of concepts; this patch improves the flow of concepts to something more sane by editing the introductions to these nodes: Attribute Syntax Type Attributes Variable Attrib

[PATCH 2/4] Docs: extend.texi: Remove trailing blanks from lines

2011-04-27 Thread Michael Witten
sed -i "s/[ $(printf '\t')]\{1,\}\$//" trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi --- trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi | 82 ++-- 1 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 41 deletions(-) diff --git a/trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi index c154958..cdbf69f 100644

[PATCH 1/4] Docs: extend.texi: Add missing semicolon for consistency

2011-04-27 Thread Michael Witten
--- trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi |2 +- 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) diff --git a/trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi b/trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi index eddff95..c154958 100644 --- a/trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi +++ b/trunk/gcc/doc/extend.texi @@ -3997,7 +3997,7 @@ @smallexample __attrib

[PATCH 0/4] Docs: extend.texi

2011-04-27 Thread Michael Witten
all of these patches together into one revision; here is a ChangeLog entry for such a revision: 2011-04-27 Michael Witten * gcc/doc/extend.texi: Add a `;', remove trailing whitespace, and reorganize nodes to group the discussion of attributes more logically. -- 1.7