On Sat, May 25, 2024, 22:34 Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 5/24/24 2:42 AM, Mariam Arutunian wrote:
> >gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/
> >
> > * crc-11.c: New test.
> > * crc-15.c: Likewise.
> > * crc-16.c: Likewise.
> > * crc-19.c: Likewise.
> > * crc-2.c: Likewise.
>
On Sat, May 25, 2024, 22:35 Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 5/24/24 2:41 AM, Mariam Arutunian wrote:
> >gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/
> >
> > * crc-builtin-zbc32.c: New file.
> > * crc-builtin-zbc64.c: Likewise.
> OK once prerequisites are approved.
>
> jeff
>
Thank you.
>
When a GORI object is constructed, we construct both GORI and a gori_map.
During destruction, I neglected to destruct the associated gori_map.
doh! sorry.
Bootstraps on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu with no regressions. And hopefully
resolves everyone's issues.
Andrew
From e98cf19c2be1ffaf65d625
From: Pan Li
Notice some mis-alignment for gen_kids_1 right hand braces as below:
if ((_q50 == _q20 && ! TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (...
{
if ((_q51 == _q21 && ! TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (...
{
Bootstrap and regtest on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu in progress,
does this look OK for trunk if successful?
-- >8 --
When propagating structural equality in build_cp_fntype_variant, we
should consider structural equality of the exception-less variant, not
of the given type which might use structural equ
This is a revamp of what started as a target specific patch.
Basically xalan (corrected, I originally thought it was perlbench) has a
bitset implementation with a bit of an oddity. Specifically setBit will
clear the bit before it is set:
if (bitToSet < 32)
{
On 5/24/24 2:41 AM, Mariam Arutunian wrote:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/riscv/
* crc-builtin-zbc32.c: New file.
* crc-builtin-zbc64.c: Likewise.
OK once prerequisites are approved.
jeff
On 5/24/24 2:42 AM, Mariam Arutunian wrote:
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/
* crc-11.c: New test.
* crc-15.c: Likewise.
* crc-16.c: Likewise.
* crc-19.c: Likewise.
* crc-2.c: Likewise.
* crc-20.c: Likewise.
* crc-24.c: Likewise.
* crc-29.c: Like
On 5/24/24 2:41 AM, Mariam Arutunian wrote:
If the target is ZBC or ZBKC, it uses clmul instruction for the CRC
calculation.
Otherwise, if the target is ZBKB, generates table-based CRC,
but for reversing inputs and the output uses bswap and brev8 instructions.
Add new tests to check CRC gener
On 5/24/24 2:41 AM, Mariam Arutunian wrote:
This patch introduces new built-in functions to GCC for computing bit-
forward and bit-reversed CRCs.
These builtins aim to provide efficient CRC calculation capabilities.
When the target architecture supports CRC operations (as indicated by
the pr
On 5/24/24 2:41 AM, Mariam Arutunian wrote:
Add two new internal functions (IFN_CRC, IFN_CRC_REV), to provide faster
CRC generation.
One performs bit-forward and the other bit-reversed CRC computation.
If CRC optabs are supported, they are used for the CRC computation.
Otherwise, table-based
libcpp/ChangeLog:
* lex.cc (do_peek_prev): Correct typo in argument to __builtin_expect()
Signed-off-by: Peter Damianov
---
libcpp/lex.cc | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/libcpp/lex.cc b/libcpp/lex.cc
index c9e44e6..de752bdc9c8 100644
--- a/libcpp/l
Both derived classes ( loop_vec_info/bb_vec_info) have their own "bbs"
field, which have exactly same purpose of recording all basic blocks
inside the corresponding vect region, while the fields are composed by
different data type, one is normal array, the other is auto_vec. This
difference causes
Some utility functions (such as vect_look_through_possible_promotion) that are
to find out certain kind of direct or indirect definition SSA for a value, may
return the original one of the SSA, not its pattern representative SSA, even
pattern is involved. For example,
a = (T1) patt_b;
pa
On Apr 27, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Mar 23, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> This patch introduces infrastructure for targets to add an offset to
>>> the label issued after the call_insn to set the call_return_pc
>>> attribute. This will be u
On Apr 27, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> On Apr 14, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Mar 23, 2023, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>>> This patch introduces infrastructure for targets to add an offset to
>>> the label issued after the call_insn to set the call_return_pc
>>> attribute. This will be u
On 24/05/2024 16:17, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On Thu, 23 May 2024 at 18:38, François Dumont wrote:
On 23/05/2024 15:31, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 23/05/24 06:55 +0200, François Dumont wrote:
As explained in this email:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/libstdc++/2024-April/058552.html
I experi
I found this section hard to understand at first (in addition to some
grammar issues) so pushed the following.
Lingling, please advise if you'd like further changes.
Gerald
---
htdocs/gcc-13/changes.html | 8
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/gcc-13/
On Apr 16, 2024, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> for gcc/ChangeLog
> PR tree-optimization/113681
> * tree-profiling.cc (pass_ipa_tree_profile::gate): Skip if
> seen_errors.
> for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> PR tree-optimization/113681
> * c-c++-common/strub-pr113681.c: N
On Apr 19, 2024, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> * gcc.target/arm/bti-1.c: Require arch, use its opts, drop skip.
> * gcc.target/arm/bti-2.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/arm/acle/pacbti-m-predef-11.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/arm/acle/pacbti-m-predef-
On Apr 22, 2024, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> PR testsuite/101169
> * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-double.p7.c: Adjust addi
> counts for ilp32.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/fold-vec-extract-float.p7.c: Likewise.
> * gcc.target/powerpc/fol
Trivial fix. Pushed.
Gerald
---
htdocs/git.html | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/git.html b/htdocs/git.html
index 22c0eec1..a6e88566 100644
--- a/htdocs/git.html
+++ b/htdocs/git.html
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@ additional branches can also be fetched if necessa
On Apr 22, 2024, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
> for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
> * gcc.target/powerpc/pr88233.c: Make some alignment strictness
> and calling conventions assumptions explicit. Restore uniform
> codegen expectations
Ping? https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024
23 matches
Mail list logo
