On 5/24/2021 4:02 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
Having just one bit control whether an expression or statement should
be allowed to trigger warnings has been a source of bug reports about
false negatives for years. PR 74765 has a representative test case
that shows how by setting th
On 5/29/2021 12:02 AM, Indu Bhagat via Gcc-patches wrote:
Hi,
This patch fixes the failing pch testcases as observed in PR testsuite/100749.
Although the PR mentions powerpc64, the issue exists on other arches but
appears to be latent.
The issue causing the failure was that the underlying ch
I commit this change which moves from ftp to https.
Eberhard, is there maybe a different/better URL to use, that does not
feature "ftp" in the hostname?
Gerald
---
htdocs/mirrors.html | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/htdocs/mirrors.html b/htdocs/mirrors.html
in
On 5/29/2021 1:55 PM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
On 5/29/21 9:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 5/28/2021 6:38 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
it turns out to be reproducible this way:
COLUMNS=80 make check-gcc-c RUNTESTFLAGS="plugin.exp=diagnostic*"
Running /home/ed/gnu/gcc-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg
On 5/29/21 9:31 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>
> On 5/28/2021 6:38 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> it turns out to be reproducible this way:
>>
>> COLUMNS=80 make check-gcc-c RUNTESTFLAGS="plugin.exp=diagnostic*"
>>
>> Running /home/ed/gnu/gcc-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp ...
>
On 5/28/2021 6:38 AM, Bernd Edlinger wrote:
Hi,
it turns out to be reproducible this way:
COLUMNS=80 make check-gcc-c RUNTESTFLAGS="plugin.exp=diagnostic*"
Running /home/ed/gnu/gcc-trunk/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/plugin/plugin.exp ...
FAIL: gcc.dg/plugin/diagnostic-test-expressions-1.c
-fplugi
On 5/8/2021 4:12 AM, YunQiang Su wrote:
MIPS release 6 requires the lw/ld/sw/sd can work with
unaligned address, while it can be implemented by
full hardware or trap&emulate.
Since it is may be fully done by hardware, we add an
option -m(no-)unaligned-access, the kernel may need it.
gcc/Chan
On 5/3/2021 9:20 AM, Robin Dapp via Gcc-patches wrote:
Following up, this patch removes the s390-specific check for the
warning and adds a new test.
Is it OK after the common-code changes are in?
Regards
Robin
--
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* c-c++-common/Wattributes.c: Remove s390
On 5/24/2021 4:12 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
On 5/20/21 10:03 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
Martin - was this intended? Can you fix it up please? (g:cb50701ec2c7)
It was not intentional. Fixed in the attached patch (where I did
a refactoring as well).
Patch can bootstrap on x86_64-linux-gnu and
On 5/26/2021 1:29 PM, Martin Sebor via Gcc-patches wrote:
The -Wvla-parameter checking of the bounds of VLA parameters in
function redeclarations has a few bugs: a) it scans the string
that encodes the attribute access representation of the VLA
bounds from the end, failing to consider that the
Jan-Benedict's tester uses -enable-werror-always and thus will trip over
certain compilation issues that my tester would miss. This patches
addresses a few minor issues in the H8 backend flagged by Jan-Benedict's
tester.
In addition to verifying this fixes the failures Jan-Benedict reported,
Hi!
I forgot to add default(none) and defaultmap(none) wherever possible on the
testcases to make sure none of the required clauses are added implicitly
(because
in that case it doesn't work with these none arguments of those default* clauses
or works differently with other default* settings.
An
On Fri, May 28, 2021 at 12:59:20AM +0200, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> * gfortran.dg/gomp/depend-iterator-1.f90: New test.
> * gfortran.dg/gomp/depend-iterator-2.f90: New test.
Something I've missed during the review but it shows up during testing:
> diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/g
13 matches
Mail list logo
