Hi!
On Sat, May 15, 2021 at 08:41:32PM +0200, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
> The typo here, is obviously mistaken removal of lines next
> to a line that was validly removed. Targets affected are
> those with a delay-slot *and* defining TARGET_FLAGS_REGNUM.
> In-tree, a git-grep says the only ones ma
Some manual pages are already using C99 syntax for integral
types 'uint32_t', but some aren't. There are some using kernel
syntax '__u32'. Fix those.
Both the kernel and the standard types are 100% binary compatible,
and the source code differences between them are very small, and
not important
Series pushed with recommended changes. Thank you!
Bill
On 5/14/21 10:55 AM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Thu, May 13, 2021 at 10:34:54PM -0500, Bill Schmidt via Gcc-patches wrote:
+mprivileged
+Target Var(rs6000_privileged) Init(0)
+Enable generation of instructions that require privileged s
Ok to commit?
When eyeballing the r12-440 / bd1cd0d0e0fe / "Remove
CC0" commit, I noticed parts that could be improved.
Regarding the first change: at first I thought that just
removing the word "better" was the best choice, as the
compared part (cc0) was apparently removed, but the
paragraph aft
Committed as obvious.
The typo here, is obviously mistaken removal of lines next
to a line that was validly removed. Targets affected are
those with a delay-slot *and* defining TARGET_FLAGS_REGNUM.
In-tree, a git-grep says the only ones matching are CRIS,
h8300 and visium. The code removal has t
On Fri, 14 May 2021, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
On Thu, May 06, 2021 at 09:42:41PM +0200, Marc Glisse wrote:
We can probably do it in 2 steps, first something like
(for cmp (eq ne)
(simplify
(cmp (bit_and:c @0 @1) @0)
(cmp (@0 (bit_not! @1)) { build_zero_cst (TREE_TYPE (@0)); })
Hi,
On Fri, May 14 2021, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> Looks like this caused:
>>
>> === acats tests ===
>> FAIL: c41325a
>> FAIL: c45347d
>> FAIL: c74402a
>> FAIL: c95085m
>> FAIL: cc3601a
>>
>> === gnat tests ===
>>
>> FAIL: gnat.dg/addr12.adb (test for exc
