Re: [PATCH] Add rocketlake to gcc.

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 5:16 AM Cui, Lili wrote: > > Hi Uros, > > This patch is about to add Rocket Lake to GCC. > Rocket Lake is based on Ice Lake client and minus SGX. > > For detailed information, please refer to > https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/download/intel-architectu

Re: [PATCH] Change march=alderlake ISA list and add m_ALDERLAKE to m_CORE_AVX2

On Mon, Apr 12, 2021 at 5:13 AM Cui, Lili wrote: > > Hi Uros, > > This patch is about to change Alder Lake ISA list to GCC add m_ALDERLAKE to > m_CORE_AVX2. > Alder Lake Intel Hybrid Technology is based on Tremont and plus > ADCX/AVX/AVX2/BMI/BMI2/F16C/FMA/LZCNT/ > PCONFIG/PKU/VAES/VPCLMULQDQ/SE

[PATCH] Add rocketlake to gcc.

Hi Uros, This patch is about to add Rocket Lake to GCC. Rocket Lake is based on Ice Lake client and minus SGX. For detailed information, please refer to https://software.intel.com/content/www/us/en/develop/download/intel-architecture-instruction-set-extensions-programming-reference.html Bootst

[PATCH] Change march=alderlake ISA list and add m_ALDERLAKE to m_CORE_AVX2

Hi Uros, This patch is about to change Alder Lake ISA list to GCC add m_ALDERLAKE to m_CORE_AVX2. Alder Lake Intel Hybrid Technology is based on Tremont and plus ADCX/AVX/AVX2/BMI/BMI2/F16C/FMA/LZCNT/ PCONFIG/PKU/VAES/VPCLMULQDQ/SERIALIZE/HRESET/KL/WIDEKL/AVX-VNNI For detailed information, pleas

[Patch, fortran] PR fortran/100029 - ICE on storage_size with polymorphic argument, PR fortran/100040 - Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable

Hi All! Proposed patch to: PR100040 - Wrong code with intent out assumed-rank allocatable PR100029 - ICE on subroutine call with allocatable polymorphic assumed-rank argument Patch tested only on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu. Made sure the code also recognized assumed-rank arrays as full arrays. Cha

Re: [committed] ada: Avoid invalid "up" link in manual

> >> With this patch the bottom navigation of the page at > >> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gnat_ugn/index.html > >> changes from > >> Next: About This Guide, Up: (dir) [Contents][Index] > >> to > >> Next: About This Guide [Contents][Index] > >> and the invalid "(dir)" link that pointed

[PATCH] c++: constraints are unevaluated operands [PR99961]

According to [temp.concept]/6 and [temp.pre]/9, a concept definition and a requires clause are both unevaluated contexts, and hence satisfaction deals only with unevaluated operands, so we should set cp_unevaluated in these three situations. (I guess we should set cp_unevaluated during normalizati

Re: [committed] ada: Avoid invalid "up" link in manual

On Sun, 11 Apr 2021, Arnaud Charlet wrote: >> With this patch the bottom navigation of the page at >> https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gnat_ugn/index.html >> changes from >> Next: About This Guide, Up: (dir) [Contents][Index] >> to >> Next: About This Guide [Contents][Index] >> and the inval

[Committed] MAINTAINERS: Add myself for write after approval

ChangeLog: 2021-04-11 Hafiz Abid Qadeer * MAINTAINERS (Write After Approval): Add myself. --- MAINTAINERS | 1 + 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+) diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS index 0fbbc0519d0..db25583b37b 100644 --- a/MAINTAINERS +++ b/MAINTAINERS @@ -568,6 +568,7 @@ Siddhes

Re: [committed] ada: Avoid invalid "up" link in manual

> This is something I have been noticing for a while, and a hint by > Sandra in a somewhat similar context taught me how to avoid it. > > With this patch the bottom navigation of the page at > https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gnat_ugn/index.html > changes from > Next: About This Guide, Up: (di

[committed] ada: Avoid invalid "up" link in manual

This is something I have been noticing for a while, and a hint by Sandra in a somewhat similar context taught me how to avoid it. With this patch the bottom navigation of the page at https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gnat_ugn/index.html changes from Next: About This Guide, Up: (dir) [Contents]

[committed] wwwdocs: bugs: Refine reference to Goldberg's paper

Pushed. Refer to the PDF version instead of Postscript and quote the title of the paper instead of "this paper". --- htdocs/bugs/index.html | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/htdocs/bugs/index.html b/htdocs/bugs/index.html index 88fba1b9..4a258213 100644 ---

Re: [Patch, fortran] 99307 - FAIL: gfortran.dg/class_assign_4.f90 execution test

Tobias noticed a major technical fault with the resubmission below: I forgot to attach the patch :-( Please find it attached this time. Paul On Tue, 6 Apr 2021 at 18:08, Paul Richard Thomas < paul.richard.tho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > I believe that the attached fixes the problems t