On 3/6/20 11:12 AM, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 06/03/20 10:09 +, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 06/03/20 07:06 +0100, François Dumont wrote:
I started to work on ranges::equal to find out if what I am trying
to do is totally silly.
With this patch ranges::equal is in pare with std::equal
speci
Hi Segher,
On 2020/3/5 下午6:42, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
Hi Bin Bin,
On Thu, Mar 05, 2020 at 10:31:39AM +0800, binbin wrote:
On 2020/3/5 上午2:35, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 03:08:41PM +0800, binbin wrote:
* config/rs6000/rs6000.h (MAX_MACHINE_MODE): Include the
On Sun, Mar 08, 2020 at 01:25:17AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On 3/7/20 6:02 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 01:21:41AM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > On 3/6/20 8:12 PM, Marek Polacek wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Mar 06, 2020 at 05:49:07PM -0500, Jason Merrill wrote:
> > > > >
Hi Sandra,
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 02:19:21PM -0700, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
> On 2/20/20 3:08 PM, Jérémy Lefaure wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > Ping for https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2019-12/msg01081.html.
> >
> > Thank you,
> > Jérémy
> >
> > On Sun, Dec 15, 2019 at 07:20:26PM +0100, Jérémy L
On Sun, 2020-03-08 at 15:53 +0900, Oleg Endo wrote:
> On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 08:51 -0700, Jeff Law wrote:
> > FWIW I've got an sh4/sh4eb bootstrap and regression test running with
> > HONOR_REG_ALLOC_ORDER defined. As Vlad mentioned, that may be a
> > viable workaround.
> >
>
> I've had a look at
On 2020-03-08 00:03, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Sat, Mar 07, 2020 at 10:06:46PM +0100, J.W. Jagersma wrote:
>> Thanks Marek and Gerald, I hadn't read that page yet. So do I resubmit
>> the final patch during stage 1, or will it end up in a queue to be
>> included when stage 1 for gcc 11 (or 10
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been submitted
by the Danish team of translators. The file is available at:
https://translationproject.org/latest/cpplib/da.po
(This file, 'cpplib-10.1-b2020020
The Translation Project robot, in the
name of your translation coordinator.
Hi,
thanks for reviewing, I've totally missed this multi-thread aspect.
David Malcolm writes:
> On Thu, 2020-03-05 at 21:34 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
>> On Thu, 2020-01-16 at 11:11 +, Andrea Corallo wrote:
>
> Responding to my own ideas about thread-safety.
>
> [...]
>
>> My first thought
Hi Paul,
***ping***
OK. Thanks for the patch!
Regards
Thomas
This is yet another case, where a deferred character length variable
loses the character length backend_decl. As previously, converting the
expression and using the string_length recovers it successfully.
Regtested on FC31/x86_64 - OK for trunk, followed by 8- and 9-branches
after a week or two?
***ping***
On Sun, 1 Mar 2020 at 16:00, Paul Richard Thomas
wrote:
>
> This is a straightforward patch, especially for the bug in the PR! The
> additional fix ensures that expr%LEN always returns a scalar. Please
> note the comment in resolve.c about bounds checking.
>
> Regtests on trunk - OK fo
On Thu, Mar 5, 2020 at 3:47 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2020-02-29 at 06:16 -0800, H.J. Lu wrote:
> > On x86, when AVX and AVX512 are enabled, vector move instructions can
> > be encoded with either 2-byte/3-byte VEX (AVX) or 4-byte EVEX (AVX512):
> >
> >0: c5 f9 6f d1 vmovdqa %
13 matches
Mail list logo
