On Wed, 19 Feb 2020 at 19:54, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> On Wed, Feb 19, 2020 at 12:19 AM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, 18 Feb 2020 at 19:40, Richard Biener
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Tue, Feb 18, 2020 at 1:52 PM Prathamesh Kulkarni
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Mon, 17 Feb 2020
Hi,
On 2020/2/22 11:12 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Tue, 18 Feb 2020, Li Jia He wrote:
Also the pattern doing the standalone transform does
/* Optimize TRUNC_MOD_EXPR by a power of two into a BIT_AND_EXPR,
i.e. "X % C" into "X & (C - 1)", if X and C are positive.
Also optimize A % (C <<
On 2/22/20 6:49 PM, Segher Boessenkool wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 06:25:43PM -0600, Peter Bergner wrote:
>> Is this still ok for GCC 8 & 9?
>
> Please do each of those backports as separate commits (so that if there
> is a problem with them, we can bisect it; it also should be easier to do
>
Thanks, committed :)
On Sat, Feb 22, 2020 at 6:10 AM Jim Wilson wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 1:04 AM Kito Cheng wrote:
> > * config/riscv/riscv.c (riscv_emit_float_compare): Change the code
> > gen
> > for LTGT.
> > (riscv_rtx_costs): Update cost model for LTGT.
>
Am 23.02.20 um 17:11 schrieb Thomas Koenig:
Committed as simple and obvious,
r10-6802-g7260547dbffd8e6442f99da8adf98ab0ce294e4e.
Better with the patch, of course.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/interface.c b/gcc/fortran/interface.c
index 429abc79ca2..4106fe5831b 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/interface.c
+
On 2020-02-18 10:39 a.m., Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
On Feb 18, 2020, at 6:30 PM, Vladimir Makarov wrote:
On 2/17/20 10:08 AM, Maxim Kuvyrkov wrote:
Hi Vladimir,
This patch increases code size at -Os on arm-linux-gnueabihf by 1% (with no
code-size reductions) on several SPEC CPU2006 benchmarks:
The following patch is for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93564
The patch was successfully bootstrapped on x86-64 and benchmarked on
SPEC2000.
commit 3133bed5d0327e8a9cd0a601b7ecdb9de4fc825d
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
Date: Sun Feb 23 16:20:05 2020 -0500
Changing cost
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 10:55:53AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> Though I'm usually uncomfortable with kicking the can down the road on these
> sorts of things, I can probably be convinced in this case. Tulio and I were
> wondering why the libmvec interface doesn't make use of ifunc capability for
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 10:42:17AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > > Have I missed something crucial?
> > I haven't seen anything in the patch that would only enable it for ELFv2,
> > and while powerpc64le-linux probably assumes TARGET_VSX unconditionally
> > (haven't verified), powerpc64-linux or p
On Sun, Feb 23, 2020 at 10:55:53AM -0600, Bill Schmidt wrote:
> > If/when it becomes necessary to have 'c' variants of functions, then a new
> > version of
> > the Vector Function ABI document will be created. And GLIBC and GCC
> > modifications to
> > comply with that new ABI will be made then.
On 2/20/20 1:14 PM, GT wrote:
‐‐‐ Original Message ‐‐‐
On Wednesday, February 19, 2020 12:33 PM, Bill Schmidt
wrote:
The reason 'c' was added to the ABI is this mailing list discussion:
https://sourceware.org/ml/libc-alpha/2019-11/msg00765.html
As long as 'b' specifies that the VSX fu
On 2/14/20 4:09 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Fri, Feb 14, 2020 at 10:02:39PM +, GT wrote:
Function rs6000_simd_clone_adjust, even though it's body is empty,
cannot simply be removed. I tried it. It resulted in ICE. In my
view, leaving it empty is preferable to modifying other files
unrelate
Another trival patch.
Regards
Thomas
Add missing closing parenthises in error message.
2020-02-23 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/93889
* interface.c (compare_parameter): Fix error message.
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog b/gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
index 5f889fb31
Committed as simple and obvious,
r10-6802-g7260547dbffd8e6442f99da8adf98ab0ce294e4e.
Regards
Thomas
Fix error message.
2020-02-23 Thomas Koenig
PR fortran/93890
* interface.c: Replace "can not" by "cannot" and remove trailing
space.
2020-02-23
Committed as r10-6801-g61c8d9e4e5f540501eaa98aae1d6c74bde7d4299
Thanks
Paul
On Sun, 23 Feb 2020 at 14:25, Thomas Koenig wrote:
>
> Hi Paul,
>
> > Regtested on FC31/x86_64 - OK for head?
>
> Looks good.
>
> Best of luck committing!
>
> Regards
>
> Thomas
--
"If you can't explain it s
Hi Paul,
Regtested on FC31/x86_64 - OK for head?
Looks good.
Best of luck committing!
Regards
Thomas
This shebang adds library tests for all cases of parenthesized aggregate
initialization that I could find. Tested locally on Linux-x64, going to
test with full suite on Linux-PPC64, OK for trunk if tests pass?
2020-02-23 Ville Voutilainen
Library-side tests for parenthesized aggregate init
This patch is relatively trivial and represents my first foray into
gitland. Thus far, it has been... well, "interesting" compared with
svn.
Class components of derived types are initialized by calls to
trans-array.c(gfc_trans_deferred_array) from
trans-decl.c(gfc_trans_deferred_vars). The compone
18 matches
Mail list logo