On Mon, 25 Jun 2018 at 18:23, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> The additions to were added in 2015 but the new
> algorithms in were not. This adds them.
>
> * include/experimental/algorithm (sample, shuffle): Add new overloads
> using per-thread random number engine.
> * testsu
Hi Marc,
Thanks for the review.
On 28 June 2018 at 14:11, Marc Glisse wrote:
> (why is there no mention of ABSU_EXPR in doc/* ?)
I will fix this in a separate patch.
>
> --- a/gcc/match.pd
> +++ b/gcc/match.pd
> @@ -571,10 +571,12 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> (copysigns (op @0)
> 2018-06-27 10:09 GMT+02:00 Janne Blomqvist :
> >
> > How about committing a patch changing to use TRUTH_{AND|OR}_EXPR, and then
> > check benchmark results (polyhedron, spec etc.)? If performance worsens, we
> > revert, if it improves, great, lets keep it?
>
> I would definitely support that. I
On 06/28/2018 11:49 AM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I played around with pr45882.c and ran into FAILs. It took me a while to
> realize that the FAILs where due to the gdb-test (a dg-final action) using
> absolute line numbers, and me adding lines before the gdb-test lines.
>
> I've written thi
On 06/28/2018 05:00 PM, Tom de Vries wrote:
> [ was: Re: [testsuite] Fix guality/pr45882.c for flto ]
>
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 02:52:31PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Atm this test in pr45882.c:
>>> ...
>>> int d = a[i]; /* { dg-
On 06/28/2018 01:16 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
>>> --- i386.md (revision 259756)
>>> +++ i386.md (working copy)
>>> @@ -3547,7 +3547,7 @@
>>> {
>>> case MODE_DF:
>>>if (TARGET_AVX && REG_P (operands[0]) && REG_P (operands[1]))
>>> -return "vmovsd\t{%1, %0, %0|%0, %0, %1}";
>>> +
On 06/28/2018 04:52 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> Hi!
>
> The newly added rs6000-modes.h is now included from rs6000.h, so it is
> needed when building plugins that include tm.h, but it wasn't listed in the
> Makefile fragments and therefore included among PLUGIN_HEADERS.
>
> Fixed thusly, tested on
[ was: Re: [testsuite] Fix guality/pr45882.c for flto ]
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 02:52:31PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Thu, 21 Jun 2018, Tom de Vries wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Atm this test in pr45882.c:
> > ...
> > int d = a[i]; /* { dg-final { gdb-test 16 "d" "112" } } */
> > ...
> > f
Hi!
The newly added rs6000-modes.h is now included from rs6000.h, so it is
needed when building plugins that include tm.h, but it wasn't listed in the
Makefile fragments and therefore included among PLUGIN_HEADERS.
Fixed thusly, tested on powerpc64le-linux, ok for trunk and 8.2?
2018-06-28 Jaku
The libgo code to create a backtrace state would sometimes call
stat(NULL). This didn't matter, since the stat failure would not
cause any further problem, but it was pointless and sloppy. The
problem was pointed out by Andreas Schwab in PR 86331. This patch
removes it. Bootstrapped and ran Go
-Wdeprecated-copy shouldn't warn about classes that the user can't change.
Tested x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, applying to trunk.
commit 8ca5b3176d0a79534b99bf0d53bb0467abb38800
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Thu Jun 28 15:41:20 2018 -0400
PR c++/86342 - -Wdeprecated-copy and system headers.
OK.
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 2:57 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
> We handle version conflict markers in source:
>
> $ cat /tmp/test.cc
>
> extern void f1 (void);
> extern void f2 (void);
> extern void f3 (void);
> extern void f4 (void);
>
> void test ()
> {
> f1 ();
> <<< HEAD
> f2 ();
> ==
[ was: [PATCH, testsuite/guality] Use line number vars in gdb-test ]
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 07:49:30PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I played around with pr45882.c and ran into FAILs. It took me a while to
> realize that the FAILs where due to the gdb-test (a dg-final action) using
> abs
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 10:34:35AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 07:03:05PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > > In fact, I'll be submitting a bug report for a missed optimization.
> > >
> > > subroutine foo(x,y) subroutine foo(x,y)
> > >real x(10), y(10)
2018-06-28 Uros Bizjak
PR target/86348
* config/i386/sse.md (*vec_extractv4si_0_zext_sse4): Use
alternative 0 in preferred_for_speed attribute.
testsuite/ChangeLog:
2018-06-28 Uros Bizjak
PR target/86348
* gcc.target/i386/pr86348.c: New test.
Bootstrapped and regressi
Hi.
I'm sending patch for situation where we create a bit-test for
entire switch. In that case split BB must be redirected so that
the original switch is a dead code.
Patch can bootstrap on ppc64le-redhat-linux and survives regression tests.
Ready to be installed?
Martin
gcc/ChangeLog:
2018-06
The fortran FE creates array descriptor types via build_distinct_type_copy
which ends up re-using the TYPE_FIELDs chain of FIELD_DECLs between
types in different type-variant chains. While that seems harmless
in practice it breaks once we try to generate C-like debug info for
it because dwarf2ou
This does the is_cu_die->is_unit_die change and also removes the
stale comment I forgot to delete when moving the guarded condition.
Bootstrapped & tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2018-06-28 Richard Biener
* dwarf2out.c (gen_subprogram_die): Use is_unit_die wh
On Thu, 28 Jun 2018, Richard Biener wrote:
>
> The fortran FE creates array descriptor types via build_distinct_type_copy
> which ends up re-using the TYPE_FIELDs chain of FIELD_DECLs between
> types in different type-variant chains. While that seems harmless
> in practice it breaks once we try
[ resending. It seems this did not get through to the mail archive. ]
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 07:49:30PM +0200, Tom de Vries wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I played around with pr45882.c and ran into FAILs. It took me a while to
> realize that the FAILs where due to the gdb-test (a dg-final action) using
> ab
On 06/23/2018 10:13 PM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> This is second part of IPA summaries clean-up. It removes some not needed
>>
>> ::get_create in ipa-pure.const.c.
>
> It breaks the attached testcase compiled with "gnatmake lto_full -f -a -flto":
>
> gnatbind -x lto_full.ali
> gnatlink lto_full.ali
Hi.
This fixes:
In file included from /space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/brig/brigspec.c:26:
/space/rguenther/src/svn/trunk/gcc/gcc.h:60:3: error: ‘option_proposer’ does
not name a type
option_proposer m_option_proposer;
Installed as obvious.
Martin
gcc/brig/ChangeLog:
2018-06-28 Martin
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018, Jason Merrill wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 8:43 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> >
> > A patch from Honza not LTO streaming DECL_ORIGINAL_TYPE ends up
> > ICEing during LTO bootstrap because we end up not re-using the
> > DIE we create late during LTRANS for a subprogram becau
Formerly used by scope_die_for this stack is now unused and just
pushed/popped to/from.
Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu, applied.
Richard.
2018-06-28 Richard Biener
* dwarf2out.c (decl_scope_table): Remove.
(push_decl_scope): Likewise.
(pop_decl_
Hi,
I played around with pr45882.c and ran into FAILs. It took me a while to
realize that the FAILs where due to the gdb-test (a dg-final action) using
absolute line numbers, and me adding lines before the gdb-test lines.
I've written this patch, which factors out the handling of relative line
n
This patch corrects the setting of the "length" attributes in the pdp11 target
for certain shift cases.
Committed.
paul
ChangeLog:
2018-06-28 Paul Koning
* config/pdp11/pdp11-protos.h (pdp11_shift_length): New function.
* config/pdp11/pdp11.c (pdp11_shift_length): N
On Jun 28 2018, Toon Moene wrote:
And - most interesting - that's how Fortran 77 formulated it (way before
PURE/IMPURE functions entered the language):
"6.6.1 Evaluation of Operands
It is not necessary for a processor to evaluate all of the operands of
an expression if the value of the expr
Hi!
This patch adds #pragma omp depobj support, so that the task dependencies
can be built at one spot and used later on from the omp_depend_t structure
that has all the necessary information (object address and dependence type)
later on.
In addition this fixes some problems in the depend clause
We handle version conflict markers in source:
$ cat /tmp/test.cc
extern void f1 (void);
extern void f2 (void);
extern void f3 (void);
extern void f4 (void);
void test ()
{
f1 ();
<<< HEAD
f2 ();
===
f3 ();
>>> 252be53... Some commit message
f4 ();
}
The C frontend's output i
Hi Christophe,
> -Original Message-
> From: Christophe Lyon
> Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2018 14:41
> To: James Greenhalgh
> Cc: Tamar Christina ; Kyrill Tkachov
> ; gcc Patches ;
> nd ; Richard Earnshaw ;
> Marcus Shawcroft
> Subject: Re: [PATCH][GCC][AArch64] Add SIMD to REG pattern for
On 06/28/2018 06:22 PM, Steve Kargl wrote:
You continue to miss my point or conveniently ignore it.
You want to special case the forced evaluation of the
operands in two specific logical expressions; namely, .and.
and .or. If you want to force evaluation of operands, then
do it for all binary o
This patch to the Go frontend changes set_placeholder_struct_type to
use build_variant_type_copy rather than build_distinct_type_copy.
This is for PR 86343, which noted that the DECL_CONTEXT of the fields
in the copy were pointing to the wrong type. Using
build_variant_type_copy puts the types in
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 07:21:21PM +0200, Janus Weil wrote:
> 2018-06-28 18:22 GMT+02:00 Steve Kargl :
> >
> > Why I think it a warning should be emitted: symmetry!.
> >
> > You complained about the lack of symmetry in 'check() .and. .false.'
> > and '.false. .and. check()'.
>
> well, my original
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 07:03:05PM +0200, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> > In fact, I'll be submitting a bug report for a missed optimization.
> >
> > subroutine foo(x,y) subroutine foo(x,y)
> >real x(10), y(10) real x(10), y(10)
> >y = 0*sin(x) y
Am 28.06.2018 um 19:21 schrieb Janus Weil:
One thing that I always failed to comprehend is people's fixation on
optimization. What's so great about your code running 0.1% faster if
the second compiler you try gives you totally different results, with
no hints
The warning added for my patch is s
2018-06-28 18:22 GMT+02:00 Steve Kargl :
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:52:43PM +0200, Janus Weil wrote:
>> 2018-06-28 16:41 GMT+02:00 Steve Kargl :
>> >> > Technically, the standard says an operand need not be evaluate,
>> >> > but you've asked people not to cite the Standard. I've also
>> >> > poi
On Jun 28 2018, Steve Kargl wrote:
You continue to miss my point or conveniently ignore it.
You want to special case the forced evaluation of the
operands in two specific logical expressions; namely, .and.
and .or. If you want to force evaluation of operands, then
do it for all binary operators
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 07:41:30AM -0700, Steve Kargl wrote:
> I am opposed to the change of TRUTH_AND_EXPR to TRUTH_ANDIF_EXPR,
> where you are special casing logical expressions that involve
> .and. and .or.
I think using TRUTH_AND_EXPR is the right thing to do, and if
fortran functions can be
On Fri, 22 Jun 2018 at 12:52, Richard Biener wrote:
>
>
> This is the main part to make considering multiple vector sizes based on
> costs less compile-time costly. It shares dataref analysis and
> dependence analysis for loop vectorization (BB vectorization is only
> adjusted to comply with the
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 05:52:43PM +0200, Janus Weil wrote:
> 2018-06-28 16:41 GMT+02:00 Steve Kargl :
> >> > Technically, the standard says an operand need not be evaluate,
> >> > but you've asked people not to cite the Standard. I've also
> >> > pointed you to F2018 Note 10.28 where it very clea
Fix and simplify the testcase so it generates dup even on latest trunk.
This fixes the failure reported in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2018-06/msg01799.html
Committed as obvious.
ChangeLog:
2018-06-28 Wilco Dijkstra
* gcc.target/aarch64/f16_mov_immediate_3.c: Fix testcase.
-
2018-06-28 16:41 GMT+02:00 Steve Kargl :
>> > Technically, the standard says an operand need not be evaluate,
>> > but you've asked people not to cite the Standard. I've also
>> > pointed you to F2018 Note 10.28 where it very clearly says that
>> > a function need not be evaluated with example nea
On 06/27/2018 11:20 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 06/26/2018 05:32 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
Attached is an updated patch to tighten up the warning and also
prevent ICEs in the middle-end like in PR 86308 or PR 86202.
I took Richard's suggestion to add the POINTER_TYPE_P() check
to detect pointer/intege
> Yes, OK if it (hopefully!) passes testing.
Yes, it passed bootstrap/regtest on x86-64/Linux so was applied.
--
Eric Botcazou
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 07:58:22AM +0200, Janus Weil wrote:
> 2018-06-27 23:47 GMT+02:00 Steve Kargl :
> > On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:46:05PM +0200, Janus Weil wrote:
> >> 2018-06-27 21:34 GMT+02:00 Thomas Koenig :
> >> >
> >> > And we are not going to change Fortran semantics. And I also oppose
>
On Thu, 2018-06-28 at 13:29 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:54 PM David Malcolm
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 15:34 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:34 PM David Malcolm > > m>
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Here's v3 of the patch (one
On 06/28/2018 05:20 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
>> This is the bulk of the changes. With this change in installed the v850
>> port should be using the new mechanism for condition code handling
>> consistently, though without optimizing well.
>
> Nice work! You need to update the v850 entry in:
>
On 06/28/2018 01:12 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Wed, 27 Jun 2018, Jeff Law wrote:
>
>>
>> On 06/18/2018 09:37 AM, Qing Zhao wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> this is the 3rd (and the last) patch for PR78809:
>>>
>>> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809
>>> Inline strcmp with small constant s
On 06/28/2018 01:16 AM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> Hello!
>
>>> --- i386.md (revision 259756)
>>> +++ i386.md (working copy)
>>> @@ -3547,7 +3547,7 @@
>>> {
>>> case MODE_DF:
>>>if (TARGET_AVX && REG_P (operands[0]) && REG_P (operands[1]))
>>> -return "vmovsd\t{%1, %0, %0|%0, %0, %1}";
>>> +
On Tue, 26 Jun 2018 at 23:53, James Greenhalgh wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 05:15:37AM -0500, Tamar Christina wrote:
> > Hi Kyrill,
> >
> > Many thanks for the review!
> >
> > The 06/19/2018 16:47, Kyrill Tkachov wrote:
> > > Hi Tamar,
> > >
> > > On 19/06/18 15:07, Tamar Christina wrote:
>
On Jun 28 2018, Janus Weil wrote:
You mean compilers which transform "if (func() .and. flag)" into "if
(flag .and. func())", and then possibly remove the call? If yes, could
you tell us which compilers you are talking about specifically?
I am 70, and haven't supported multiple compilers for
Hi!
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 03:14:18PM -0700, Carl Love wrote:
> The following patch adds missing test cases for
> vec_extract_fp32_from_shortl(), vec_extract_fp32_from_shorth(), and
> vec_extract().
This is fine for trunk. Thank you!
Segher
> 2018-06-27 Carl Love
>
> * gcc.targe
2018-06-28 13:05 GMT+02:00 N.M. Maclaren :
> On Jun 28 2018, Janus Weil wrote:
>>
>>
>>> if we add a warning, we should add it both for
>>>
>>> if (flag .and. func())
>>> and for
>>> if (func() .and. flag)
>>>
>>> because the standard also allows reversing the test (which my
>>> original test did).
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 3:54 PM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 15:34 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:34 PM David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's v3 of the patch (one big patch this time, rather than a
> > > kit).
> > >
> > > Like the v2 patch kit,
On Thu, Jun 28, 2018 at 12:46 PM Eric Botcazou wrote:
>
> > Related we're also missing to verify_location () on those in
> > verify_gimple_in_cfg. Having stale references to GCed BLOCKs
> > via locations can be difficult to track down...
> >
> > So can you add the verification bits as well?
>
> L
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:00 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 25 June 2018 at 20:01, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:13 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> [PATCH 1/3][POPCOUNT] Handle COND_EXPR in expression_expen
> This is the bulk of the changes. With this change in installed the v850
> port should be using the new mechanism for condition code handling
> consistently, though without optimizing well.
Nice work! You need to update the v850 entry in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/backends.html
> One of the intere
> This change converts the pdp11 back end to use CCmode rather than cc0. It
> is functional and the testsuite compile sections runs at least as well as
> before.
Nice work! You need to update the pdp11 entry in:
https://gcc.gnu.org/backends.html
> There is additional work left to be done; for
On Jun 28 2018, Janus Weil wrote:
if we add a warning, we should add it both for
if (flag .and. func())
and for
if (func() .and. flag)
because the standard also allows reversing the test (which my
original test did).
well, I really don't want to warn for hypothetical problems. Since we
curr
> But then why not expose this as extra field in ID instead of repeatedly
> calling gimple_location?
That's a matter of taste I guess.
> I don't have an issue with using input_location here until we fix the
> gimplifier...
OK, patch dropped.
--
Eric Botcazou
> Related we're also missing to verify_location () on those in
> verify_gimple_in_cfg. Having stale references to GCed BLOCKs
> via locations can be difficult to track down...
>
> So can you add the verification bits as well?
Like this?
* tree-cfg.c (verify_gimple_in_cfg): Call verify_
On June 28, 2018 12:28:15 PM GMT+02:00, Eric Botcazou
wrote:
>> More references to input_location aren't ideal. But I don't think
>> that's a strong enough reason to reject.
>
>This can be avoided relatively easily though, patch to that effect
>attached.
>
>Tested on x86-64/Linux, OK for the mai
> More references to input_location aren't ideal. But I don't think
> that's a strong enough reason to reject.
This can be avoided relatively easily though, patch to that effect attached.
Tested on x86-64/Linux, OK for the mainline?
* tree-inline.c (remap_gimple_stmt): Replace input_lo
Add myself to write after approval in MAINTAINERS.
Committed as r262216.
Jackson
Index: ChangeLog
===
--- ChangeLog (revision 262215)
+++ ChangeLog (working copy)
@@ -1,3 +1,7 @@
+2018-06-28 Jackson Woodruff
+
+ * MAIN
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:34 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Sandiford writes:
> > Richard Biener writes:
> >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:04 PM Richard Sandiford
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> When following the definitions of SSA names, some recognisers
> >>> already cope with statements that
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 11:31 AM Richard Sandiford
wrote:
>
> Richard Sandiford writes:
> > Richard Biener writes:
> >> On Mon, Jun 18, 2018 at 5:04 PM Richard Sandiford
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> When following the definitions of SSA names, some recognisers
> >>> already cope with statements that
On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 7:01 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
wrote:
>
> Hi Richard,
>
> Thanks for the review.
>
> On 25 June 2018 at 20:02, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 22, 2018 at 11:14 AM Kugan Vivekanandarajah
> > wrote:
> >>
> >> gcc/ChangeLog:
> >
> > The canonical way is calling simpli
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:27 PM David Malcolm wrote:
>
> On Mon, 2018-06-25 at 15:34 +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 20, 2018 at 6:34 PM David Malcolm
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Here's v3 of the patch (one big patch this time, rather than a
> > > kit).
> > >
> > > Like the v2 patch kit,
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 10:12 PM Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 06/26/2018 02:54 AM, Eric Botcazou wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this makes sure the goto_locus present (or not) on edges is properly
> > remapped
> > during inlining.
> >
> > Tested on x86-64/Linux, OK for the mainline?
> >
> >
> > 2018-06-26 Eri
Hi,
On 28/06/2018 03:22, David Malcolm wrote:
[snip]
If I'm following you right, the idea is that gcc should complain
because two different things in the user's source code contradict
each
other.
In such circumstances, I think we ought to try to print *both*
locations, so that we're showing, r
Hello!
> So what I'm confused about is in the original output template operand
> 0 is duplicated. In the new template operand 1 is duplicated.
>
> Presumably what you're trying to accomplish is avoiding a false read
> on operand 0 (the destination)? Can you please confirm?
> Knowing that shoul
When the compiler is configured with --enable-initfini-array,
config/initfini-array.h gets included after config/vxworks.h by tm.h, so
the definitions of TARGET_ASM_CONSTRUTOR/TARGET_ASM_DESTRUCTOR in
vxworks.h get undone in initfini-array.h. Hence, we might as well not
define the vxworks_asm_out_*
In order to allow ZCX on VxWorks, we need the frame_dummy function to do
the register_frame_info(). So make sure crtbegin.o and crtend.o are
available for use with a custom spec file.
2018-06-04 Rasmus Villemoes
libgcc/
* config.host: Add crtbegin.o and crtend.o for
powerpc-
The target OS actually runs all function pointers found in the _ctors
array when the module is loaded. So it is not that hard to make use of
the "modern" .init_array/.fini_array mechanism - it mostly just requires
a linker script adding the _ctors and _dtors symbols and terminating
LONG(0) entries.
In order to build crtstuff.c, I need to ensure the headers in
target/h/wrn/coreip are also searched. Of course, that can be done
similar to how wrn/coreip gets manually added for libgcc, e.g. by adding
CRTSTUFF_T_CFLAGS += -I$(WIND_BASE)/target/h
-I$(WIND_BASE)/target/h/wrn/coreip
But without
Patches 1, 2 and 4 (the latter was number 6 previously) are unchanged
from the first round, apart from small changes in the commit log
wording. Patch 3 now includes parentheses in the macro
definition. Patches 4 and 5 are dropped.
4/4 is mostly a minor optimization, omitting a tiny bit of dead cod
^ gentle ping.
On 06/08/2018 05:54 PM, Mikhail Kashkarov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I've updated patches for std::string sanitization and disabling CXX11
> string SSO usage for correct sanitization.
>
> >> _M_destroy(_M_allocated_capacity);
> >>+ else
> >>+ __annotate_delete();
>
Hi Thomas,
> if we add a warning, we should add it both for
>
> if (flag .and. func())
>
> and for
>
> if (func() .and. flag)
>
> because the standard also allows reversing the test (which my
> original test did).
well, I really don't want to warn for hypothetical problems. Since we
currently do
Hello!
>> --- i386.md (revision 259756)
>> +++ i386.md (working copy)
>> @@ -3547,7 +3547,7 @@
>> {
>> case MODE_DF:
>>if (TARGET_AVX && REG_P (operands[0]) && REG_P (operands[1]))
>> -return "vmovsd\t{%1, %0, %0|%0, %0, %1}";
>> +return "%vmovsd\t{%d1, %0|%0, %d1}";
>>return "
On Wed, 27 Jun 2018, Jeff Law wrote:
>
> On 06/18/2018 09:37 AM, Qing Zhao wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > this is the 3rd (and the last) patch for PR78809:
> >
> > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78809
> > Inline strcmp with small constant strings
> >
> > The design doc for PR78809 is at:
On 06/22/2018 06:09 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 06/22/2018 05:25 AM, Martin Liška wrote:
>> On 06/20/2018 05:27 PM, David Malcolm wrote:
>>> On Mon, 2018-05-14 at 14:51 +0200, Martin Liška wrote:
Main part where I still need to write ChangeLog file and
gcc.sh needs to be moved to bash-comple
81 matches
Mail list logo
