Hi!
On Sun, Oct 22, 2017 at 09:13:11PM +0100, Richard Sandiford wrote:
> rtx_equal_for_field_assignment_p had:
>
> x = adjust_address_nv (x, GET_MODE (y),
> -subreg_lowpart_offset (GET_MODE (x),
> GET_MODE (y)
rtx_equal_for_field_assignment_p had:
x = adjust_address_nv (x, GET_MODE (y),
-subreg_lowpart_offset (GET_MODE (x),
GET_MODE (y)));
But subreg_lowpart_offset returns an unsigned int and
adjust_address_nv
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Uros Bizjak wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 2:15 PM, Joseph Myers wrote:
>
>> This is PR target/52451.
>>
>> A testcase (conditional on the fenv_exceptions effective-target) that
>> ordered comparisons with quiet NaNs set FE_INVALID would be a good idea,
>> but i
Hello!
In PR 82628 Jakub figured out that insn patterns that consume carry
flag were not 100% correct. Due to this issue, combine is able to
simplify various CC_REG propagations that result in invalid code.
Attached patch fixes (well, mitigates) the above problem by splitting
the double-mode comp
Hello world,
the attached patch fixes the PR by calling gfc_simplify_expr for
parameter arrays, which do not yet appear to simplified completely
by the time they reach gfc_simplify_matmul.
I suspect this will also fix some more simplification issues, but I
didn't search for other cases.
Regress
I moved the tests to gcc.target/i386 directory and committed the changes.
Igor
> -Original Message-
> From: Andreas Schwab [mailto:sch...@linux-m68k.org]
> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 1:41 PM
> To: Tsimbalist, Igor V
> Cc: Uros Bizjak ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
> Subject: Re: 0006-Par
There is no need to insert ENDBR instruction if function is only called
directly.
OK for trunk if there is no regressions?
H.J.
gcc/
PR target/82659
* config/i386/i386.c (pass_insert_endbranch::gate): Return
false if function is only called directly.
gcc/testsuite/
Those 2 tests were removed during reviewing as they tested __builtin versions.
ChangeLog was not updated.
Igor
> -Original Message-
> From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Sunday, October 22, 2017 1:59 PM
> To: Tsimbalist, Igor V
> Cc: Uros Bizjak ; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
On Sat, 2 Sep 2017, Daniel Volchixin wrote:
> URL: http://mirror.linux-ia64.org/gnu/gcc/
> Country/City: Russia / Novosibirsk
> Contact email / name: dan...@volchixin.co.uk (Daniel Volchixin)
Thank you for hosting this mirror, Daniel and letting us know.
I added this to our mirrors page with the
This came up during a conversation at the Tools Cauldron in Praha,
with David (Malcolm) I believe, I apparently did not commit the
local change then.
Applied now.
Gerald
Index: faq.html
===
RCS file: /cvs/gcc/wwwdocs/htdocs/faq.html
On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 3:56 AM, Tsimbalist, Igor V
wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Uros Bizjak [mailto:ubiz...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, October 13, 2017 10:02 AM
>> To: Tsimbalist, Igor V
>> Cc: gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
>> Subject: Re: 0006-Part-6.-Add-x86-tests-for-Intel-CET-imp
FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-nocf-check-1a.c -Wc++-compat (test for warnings, lin\
e 17)
FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-nocf-check-1a.c -Wc++-compat (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
xgcc: error: unrecognized command line option '-mcet'
FAIL: c-c++-common/attr-nocf-check-3a.c -Wc++-compat (test f
On Thu, 19 Oct 2017, David Malcolm wrote:
>> In file included from
>> /scratch/tmp/gerald/gcc-HEAD/gcc/unique-ptr-tests.cc:23:
>> In file included from
>> /scratch/tmp/gerald/gcc-HEAD/gcc/../include/unique-ptr.h:77:
>> In file included from /usr/include/c++/v1/memory:629:
>> /usr/include/c++/v1/t
13 matches
Mail list logo
