HI,
figured I'd ping this to see if we can come to some concensus, I don't
care much what we choose as a namespace, I just want to get this in so
we can use it more.
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 09:43:21PM +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> On 05/08/17 20:05 +0100, Pedro Alves wrote:
> > On 08/04/2017 07
Jeff, this is the other attribute patch I mentioned the other
day:
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2017-08/msg01103.html
The Glibc and libstdc++ changes have already been committed:
https://sourceware.org/ml/glibc-cvs/2017-q3/msg00587.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-cvs/2017-08/msg00459
single element vector types.
> */
> + if (nunits < 1)
> return NULL_TREE;
>
>vectype = build_vector_type (scalar_type, nunits);
>
>
>
That breaks vect/pr68577.c on aarch64.
during RTL pass: expand
/opt/gcc/gcc-20170902/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr685
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 6:11 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
> On 09/01/2017 02:18 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Attached are misc cleanups to tree-ssa-threadbackwards.c and friends.
>> The main gist of the patch is making the path vectors live in the
>> heap, not GC. But I also cleaned up some comme
On Fri, Sep 1, 2017 at 10:16 PM, Trevor Saunders wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 04:18:20PM -0400, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
>> Hi.
>>
>> Attached are misc cleanups to tree-ssa-threadbackwards.c and friends.
>> The main gist of the patch is making the path vectors live in the
>> heap, not GC. But I
On September 2, 2017 1:01:11 PM GMT+02:00, Eric Botcazou
wrote:
>Hi,
>
>this is the bootstrap failure reported for the 7 branch on
>SPARC64/Solaris:
>
>Comparing stages 2 and 3
>Bootstrap comparison failure!
>gcc/go/parse.o differs
>make[2]: *** [compare] Error 1
>
>On Solaris, the bootstrap is u
The typical usage on alpha is done with passing -mieee, which
sets -mfp-trap-mode=su.
I found it confusing, at least.
---
gcc/doc/invoke.texi | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/gcc/doc/invoke.texi b/gcc/doc/invoke.texi
index f7bad9d23..acdb17ba5 100644
--- a/
On September 1, 2017 10:33:10 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>This is something that has been reported privately to me.
>This is in code introduced in
>https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2016-03/msg00660.html
>and looks indeed like a pasto to me, before the loop there is
>a very simila
On September 1, 2017 10:36:05 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>Hi!
>
>I'm seeing on the trunk errors like:
>Traceback (most recent call last):
> File "", line 1, in
> File "../../gcc/gdbhooks.py", line 441
>if name == 'E_VOIDmode':
> ^
>TabError: inconsistent u
On September 1, 2017 10:28:16 PM GMT+02:00, Jakub Jelinek
wrote:
>On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 07:10:51PM +0200, Richard Biener wrote:
>> OK, I thought we have one. Can you add a helper for it please?
>> replace_with_nop or so? I thought there's maybe replace_with_value
>which
>> handles null lhs b
Hi,
this is the bootstrap failure reported for the 7 branch on SPARC64/Solaris:
Comparing stages 2 and 3
Bootstrap comparison failure!
gcc/go/parse.o differs
make[2]: *** [compare] Error 1
On Solaris, the bootstrap is usually an old-style bootstrap, meaning that the
debug info is generated duri
11 matches
Mail list logo