Re: [PATCH, i386]: Use btr/bts/btc some more (PR target/46091)

2017-08-26 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Sun, 27 Aug 2017, Gerald Pfeifer wrote: >> 2017-08-21 Uros Bizjak >> >> PR target/46091 >> * config/i386/i386.md (*btsq_imm): Rename from *btsq. >> (*btrq_imm): Rename from *btrq. >> (*btcq_imm): Rename from *btcq. >> (btsc): New code attribute. >> (*): New insn patte

Re: [PATCH, i386]: Use btr/bts/btc some more (PR target/46091)

2017-08-26 Thread Gerald Pfeifer
On Mon, 21 Aug 2017, Uros Bizjak wrote: > 2017-08-21 Uros Bizjak > > PR target/46091 > * config/i386/i386.md (*btsq_imm): Rename from *btsq. > (*btrq_imm): Rename from *btrq. > (*btcq_imm): Rename from *btcq. > (btsc): New code attribute. > (*): New insn pattern. > (

Re: [patch, libgfortran] PR78387 OpenMP segfault/stack size exceeded writing to internal file

2017-08-26 Thread Jerry DeLisle
ping - I will commit if I hear no objections. Jerry On 08/19/2017 10:12 PM, Jerry DeLisle wrote: > Hi all, > > I have decided to simply delete the internal unit stack altogether. > > The original intent was to save time with internal unit I/O by avoiding > reallocating a gfc_unit structure ever

Re: [patch, fortran] Fix regression with inline matmul

2017-08-26 Thread Jerry DeLisle
On 08/26/2017 11:24 AM, Thomas Koenig wrote: > Hello world, > > to relieve the boredom on the fortran mailing list and to fix > a regression I thought I'd submit a patch :-) > > Apparently, a call to CONJG wasn't picking up the right > typespec, which led to an ICE with gimplification later. > >

[patch, fortran] Fix regression with inline matmul

2017-08-26 Thread Thomas Koenig
Hello world, to relieve the boredom on the fortran mailing list and to fix a regression I thought I'd submit a patch :-) Apparently, a call to CONJG wasn't picking up the right typespec, which led to an ICE with gimplification later. Regression-tested. OK for trunk? Regards Thomas 2