Support for ns32k was removed in GCC4.
---
include/longlong.h | 36
1 file changed, 36 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/longlong.h b/include/longlong.h
index 9d3ab21be..c24568ace 100644
--- a/include/longlong.h
+++ b/include/longlong.h
@@ -858,42 +858,6 @@ ex
On Mon, Jun 12, 2017 at 12:56 AM, Tamar Christina
wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> this patch implements a optimization rewriting
>
> x * copysign (1.0, y) and
> x * copysign (-1.0, y)
This reminds me:
copysign(-1.0, y) can be just optimized to:
copysign(1.0, y)
I did that in my patch here:
https://gcc.gnu
Hi,
I decided to split my previous patch into two different patches, one
for floating point and one for integer. This is the floating point
version as we can use copysign here which should allow for more cases
to be optimized and even by a phiopt which uses match-and-simplify (I
hope to be able
Committed as obvious:
Committing to svn+ssh://jvdeli...@gcc.gnu.org/svn/gcc/trunk ...
M gcc/fortran/ChangeLog
M gcc/fortran/arith.c
Committed r249627
After regression testing.
Jerry
--- trunk/gcc/fortran/arith.c 2017/06/24 19:31:24 249626
+++ trunk/gcc/fortran
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 12:47 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Sat, 24 Jun 2017, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
>>> * if X is NaN, we may get a qNaN with the wrong sign bit. We probably
>>> don't
>>> care much though...
>>
>>
>> Ok, I changed it to when not honoring NANs.
>
>
> Note that I have no idea what gu
On Sat, 24 Jun 2017, Andrew Pinski wrote:
* if X is NaN, we may get a qNaN with the wrong sign bit. We probably don't
care much though...
Ok, I changed it to when not honoring NANs.
Note that I have no idea what guarantees we give in gcc. It is quite
possible that your patch is fine without
On Fri, Jun 23, 2017 at 11:50 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Jun 2017, Andrew Pinski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>> I saw this on llvm's review site (https://reviews.llvm.org/D34579)
>> and I thought why not add it to GCC. I expanded more than what was
>> done on the LLVM patch.
>>
>> I added the follo
Hi,
As per message on the D language being accepted, this adds myself as a
maintainer of the D front-end and libphobos runtime library.
David, should this wait until the rest has been approved?
Thanks,
Iain.
---
ChangeLog:
2017-06-24 Iain Buclaw
* MAINTAINERS: Add myself D front-end and l
On 28 May 2017 at 23:17, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> This patch adds GCC builtins and runtime support for GDC compiled code.
>
> - module __entrypoint defines the C main function. Its contents are
> parsed and compiled in during compilation, but only if needed.
> - module gcc.atomic is a deprecated
On 28 May 2017 at 23:16, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> This patch adds D language support to the GCC testsuite.
>
> As well as generating the DejaGNU options for compile and link tests,
> handles the conversion from DMD-style compiler options to GDC.
>
> ---
Added a few extra comments for procedures, alte
On 28 May 2017 at 23:15, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> This patch add D language support to targets of GCC itself.
>
> These are used to declare pre-defined version identifiers in the D
> language that describe something about the target that the front-end
> itself is unable to obtain. Version conditions
On 28 May 2017 at 23:15, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> This patch adds D language support to GCC itself.
>
Updates from the previous are:
- Applied patch on rs6000/rs6000.c also to powerpcspe/powerpcspe.c.
- Added d/dfrontend sources picked up by exgettext to list of EXCLUDES.
---
---
gcc/ChangeLog
On 28 May 2017 at 23:12, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> This patch adds the D frontend language configure make files, as
> described on the anatomy of a language front-end.
>
Only change since previous is adding D_TARGET_OBJS as per comments on
use of targetdm.
Regards,
Iain.
---
diff --git a/gcc/d/Make-
On 28 May 2017 at 23:11, Iain Buclaw wrote:
> This patch just includes all changelogs for the D front-end (GDC),
> going back to the dawn of time itself.
>
> Change logs for the DMD front-end and libraries are kept on the dlang site.
>
Updated changelogs following updates to [patch 2/13].
Regard
On Sat, Jun 24, 2017 at 5:34 AM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I remember wanting to add this when the undefined-overflow case was
> introduced a while ago.
>
> It turns out the tree where I wrote this wasn't clean. Since the rest is
> details, I am including it in this patch, hope it is ok.
Yo
Hello,
I remember wanting to add this when the undefined-overflow case was
introduced a while ago.
It turns out the tree where I wrote this wasn't clean. Since the rest is
details, I am including it in this patch, hope it is ok.
Bootstrap + testsuite on powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu.
2017-
Dear All,
Please find attached a draft patch for the above PR, together with PRs
40737, 55763, 57019 and 57116. These PRs constitute problems
associated with the last F95 feature that gfortran does not completely
implement.
I want to sound out if this is acceptable as the way to fix these
problem
On Jun 23 2017, Ian Lance Taylor wrote:
> Andreas, can we avoid the problem for earlier glibc versions with a
> patch like the appended?
>
> Ian
>
> diff --git a/libgo/sysinfo.c b/libgo/sysinfo.c
> index a1afc7d1..80407443 100644
> --- a/libgo/sysinfo.c
> +++ b/libgo/sysinfo.c
> @@ -38,7 +38,10 @
18 matches
Mail list logo
