P0292 defines the notion of "discarded statement" which is almost but
not quite the same as "unevaluated operand". This PR shows a case
where we need to be able to tell that we're in a discarded statement
at a lower level than in the parser, so this patch moves the
information about being in a dis
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Spanish team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/es.po
(This file, 'gcc-7.1-b20170101.es.po',
PR 54124 complains that the documentation for preprocessor options like
-dM is hard to find because the string "-dM" doesn't appear explicitly
in the table. Instead, it's documented as @samp{M} in a subtable under
the -dCHARS option. The corresponding documentation of the more general
compile
cpplib-7.1-b20170101.vi.po.gz
Description: Binary data
The Translation Project robot, in the
name of your translation coordinator.
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'cpplib' has been submitted
by the Vietnamese team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/cpplib/vi.po
(This file, 'cpplib-7.1-b20170
Hello, gentle maintainer.
This is a message from the Translation Project robot.
A revised PO file for textual domain 'gcc' has been submitted
by the Vietnamese team of translators. The file is available at:
http://translationproject.org/latest/gcc/vi.po
(This file, 'gcc-7.1-b20170101.vi.po
On 01/06/2017 01:55 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 01/05/2017 02:53 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
When the size passed to a call to a function like memcpy is a signed
integer whose range has a negative lower bound and a positive upper
bound the lower bound of the range of the argument after conversion
to size
I've checked in this patch to modernize the tutorial information about
the preprocessor search path in cpp.texi -- in particular, removing the
discussion of the deprecated -I- option, better integrating information
about the preferred replacement -iquote and -system options into the
flow, and r
PR c++/72803 describes an issue where a fix-it hint is to be emitted at
column 512 of a 511-column source line, leading to an ICE.
The root cause is a bug in linemap_line_start, when transitioning from
lines >= 512 in width to narrow lines.
The wide line in the reproducer has a line map with:
m
On 01/05/2017 01:34 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Wed, Jan 4, 2017 at 8:24 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
The more I think about this the more I'm sure we need to verify pt.null is
not in the points-to set.I've taken the above testcase and added it as a
negative test. Bootstrapped, regression tested
Hi Paul,
thanks for review. Committed as r244196.
Best regards and happy new year to you,
Andre
On Sat, 7 Jan 2017 15:06:20 +0100
Paul Richard Thomas wrote:
> Hi Andre and Dominique,
>
> Apart from s/allows there allocation/allows their allocation/ this is
> OK for trunk.
>
> Given t
Hi Paul,
you are right. The patch implements the feature of pointer components in
derived type coarrays and was motivated by 78781. The "regression" (like so
many) is that without the patch the compiler ICEs while it errored before. I
have given up to complain everytime when a pr is called a regre
Hi Andre and Dominique,
Apart from s/allows there allocation/allows their allocation/ this is
OK for trunk.
Given the scale of the patch, can this really be a regression?
Thanks
Paul
On 7 January 2017 at 13:47, Dominique d'Humières wrote:
> I have this patch in my working tree and it works a
The following patch fixes errors of the kind
libgcc/config/i386/cpuinfo.c:260:17: runtime error: left shift of 1 by 31
places cannot be represented in type ‘int'
2017-01-07 Dominique d'Humieres
PR target/71017
* config/i386/cpuid.h: Fix undefined behavior.
--- ../_clean/gcc/
On 01/04/2017 07:11 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Tue, Jan 3, 2017 at 6:36 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
On 12/20/2016 09:16 AM, Richard Biener wrote:
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 3:41 PM, Aldy Hernandez wrote:
Hi folks.
This is a follow-up on Jeff and Richi's interaction on the aforementioned
PR
h
I have this patch in my working tree and it works as expected.
> Also fixes pr78935.
Confirmed.
Thanks for the patch,
Dominique
On January 6, 2017 7:56:10 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>Hi!
>
>If-conversion can't easily predict whether outer loop vectorization
>will be
>successful or not. In GCC 6, we'd version and guard with
>LOOP_VECTORIZED
>only the inner loop, which is beneficial if the outer loop
>vectorization
On January 6, 2017 8:00:21 PM GMT+01:00, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
>On Fri, Jan 06, 2017 at 05:58:05PM +0100, Christophe Lyon wrote:
>> > Trying now:
>> >
>> > 2017-01-06 Jakub Jelinek
>> >
>> > * Makefile.in (CFLAGS, CPPFLAGS, LDFLAGS): Remove -fno-lto.
>> > (NOLTO_FLAGS): New varia
Hi!
Committed as obvious to trunk.
2017-01-07 Jakub Jelinek
PR translation/79018
* params.def (PARAM_MAX_STORES_TO_MERGE): Add missing space between
the and store.
--- gcc/params.def.jj 2017-01-01 12:45:36.0 +0100
+++ gcc/params.def 2017-01-07 09:35:05.
19 matches
Mail list logo