On 03/21/2016 11:44 AM, Richard Henderson wrote:
On 03/21/2016 06:40 AM, Jiong Wang wrote:
On 17/03/16 19:17, Richard Henderson wrote:
PR target/70120
* varasm.c (for_each_section): New.
* varasm.h (for_each_section): Declare.
* config/aarch64/aarch64.c (aarch64_align_code_section):
These two are unused too. Bootstrapped etc. x86_64-linux.
OK for stage1?
* regs.h (struct reg_info_t): Delete freq_calls_crossed and
throw_calls_crossed.
(REG_FREQ_CALLS_CROSSED): Delete.
(REG_N_THROWING_CALLS_CROSSED): Delete.
* regstat.c (regstat_bb_compu
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 09:20:36AM +1030, Alan Modra wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 01:03:18AM +0100, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
> > >@@ -3536,7 +3557,8 @@ update_equiv_regs (void)
> > > {
> > > /* Note that the statement below does not affect the priority
> > >in
On 03/17/2016 06:40 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
On 03/17/2016 08:07 AM, Jason Merrill wrote:
On 03/09/2016 05:09 PM, Martin Sebor wrote:
While going through constexpr bugs looking for background
on one I'm currently working on I came across bug 65579 -
[C++11] gcc requires definition of a static co
70353 is a problem with the function-local static declaration of
__func__. Normally constexpr functions can't have local statics, so
this is only an issue with __func__. Meanwhile, core issue 1962 looks
like it's going to be resolved by changing __func__ et al to be prvalue
constants of type
Committed as obvious.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
PR c++/62212
* g++.dg/template/mangle2.C: The dg-do directive should be
"compile" not "assemble".
---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/template/mangle2.C | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g
On Fri, Mar 25, 2016 at 5:11 PM, Kirill Yukhin wrote:
> Hello,
> Patch in the bottom fixes ICE caused by incosistence of modes
> in andn splitter.
>
> Bootstrapped & regtested (32/64b x86 targets).
> Richard, is it ok for main trunk?
>
> gcc/
> PR target/70406
> * config/i386/i38
On 03/24/2016 03:25 PM, Jeff Law wrote:
On 03/24/2016 09:20 AM, Bernd Schmidt wrote:
Like this? No one has yet approved any better wording for the message,
so given that you said "it's not a regression" I've left it, but I would
now prefer "linemarker ignored due to incorrect nesting".
Bernd
Hello,
Patch in the bottom fixes ICE caused by incosistence of modes
in andn splitter.
Bootstrapped & regtested (32/64b x86 targets).
Richard, is it ok for main trunk?
gcc/
PR target/70406
* config/i386/i386.md (define_split, andn): Fix modes.
gcc/testsuite/
PR target/
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 15:58:18 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 05:45:52PM +0300, Ilya Verbin wrote:
> > www.cilkplus.org/sites/default/files/open_specifications/Intel_Cilk_plus_lang_spec_1.2.htm
> > says:
> > In C++, the control variable shall be declared and initialized w
On Thu, Mar 24, 2016 at 12:51:05PM -0400, David Edelsohn wrote:
> The patch did not convert all "j" constraints, so the ChangeLog needs
> to be a little clearer to explain which alternatives required the
> change.
Um, I did intend to change all "j" constraints in insns handling
decimal float. I s
Hi,
the above ICE is fixed by the following simple/trivial fix:
Index: gcc/fortran/interface.c
===
--- gcc/fortran/interface.c (revision 234170)
+++ gcc/fortran/interface.c (working copy)
@@ -2006,7 +2006,7 @@ compare_paramet
12 matches
Mail list logo
