Please ignore the previous patch sent. The attachment was wrong.
> There's no point in the buffer or the sprintf.
> The text is short enough to repeat whole pattern in the array:
Updated the patch for the above suggestions.
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="execute.exp compile.exp dg.exp" passes.
Is i
Hi,
When running the testsuite on a sh-elf configuration, some test cases
fail due to multiple definitions of the function '_init'. This is
because on sh-elf every function is automatically prefixed with a '_'
char. When defining a C function 'init' in some code, the actual name
becomes '_init'
> -Original Message-
> From: H.J. Lu [mailto:hjl.to...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, November 28, 2014 10:45 PM
> To: Zhenqiang Chen
> Cc: Richard Henderson; GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [PATCH, ifcvt] Fix PR63917
>
> On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Zhenqiang Chen
> wrote:
> >
> >> -Orig
Hi,
As mentioned in the PR, the original fix could wrongly delete insns,
which e.g. shows in the new gcc.dg/atomic/stdatomic-flag.c failures.
Thus, add some more checks to make sure that it's safe to delete it.
Tested with
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim\{-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb}"
commit
> There's no point in the buffer or the sprintf.
> The text is short enough to repeat whole pattern in the array:
Updated the patch for the above suggestions.
Is it ok for upstream?
Regards
Ganesh
prefetch.diff
Description: prefetch.diff
On 11/27/2014 08:57 AM, Marek Polacek wrote:
-/* { dg-error "is not a constant expression" "" { target c++ } 12 } */
+/* { dg-error "" "" { xfail { *-*-* } } 11 } */
Please keep the expected message.
Jason
This patch to the Go frontend, by Chris Manghane, avoids crashing on
code with self-referential types like
type T interface {
m() [unsafe.Sizeof(T(nil).m())]int
}
This kind of code is perverse but of course the compiler should not
crash. This is http://golang.org/issue/6637. Bootstrapped
This patch by Peter Collingbourne adds a local variant of the
move-if-change script, called mvifdiff, so that libgo can be built
outside of the GCC tree. Bootstrapped on x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu.
Committed to mainline.
Ian
Index: libgo/Makefile.am
=
Finally, does anyone know why we don't use the stored size in the
facet virtual functions that return strings? e.g.
virtual string
do_grouping() const
{ return _M_data->_M_grouping; }
We could save the cost of a strlen call:
virtual string
do_grouping() const
{ ret
I think we also need this to make __numpunct_cache and
__moneypunct_cache exception-safe. If we set _M_allocated=true at the
start of the _M_cache functions and then an allocation throws we will
delete[] the memory allocated in _M_cache, but then the cache's
destructor will see _M_allocated==true
Hi,
In libgcc/lib1funcs.S the usage of the __SHMEDIA__ macro seems to
mismatch the setup in sh/sh-c.c (sh_cpu_cpp_builtins). __SHMEDIA__ is
always defined when building for SH5 / SH64, even when the subtarget is
SHcompact. Thus, when building for SHcompact testing '#ifdef
__SHMEDIA__' will resul
PING for https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-11/msg03281.html
Only the build changes have still to be reviewed; the Graphite part is
already approved – as is the loosely related follow-up patch.
Tobias Burnus wrote:
This patch adds a configure check for isl_schedule_constraints_compute_sc
On 24/11/14 18:24 +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 24-11-14 18:12, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 24/11/14 17:48 +0100, Tom de Vries wrote:
On 14-11-14 13:18, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
This adds system_error support to iostreams, including the required
base class changes to std::ios_base::failure. The ab
> Regarding gfc_warning, what do you think should we do?
> a) Mapping gfc_warning to gfc_warning_now as suggested in
> https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-11/msg00141.html
I’m not totally convinced that removing buffer for warnings is safe in all
cases.
Probably we don’t trigger it in the testsu
FX wrote:
Cool stuff! Thanks for doing this, and OK to commit. FX
Thanks for the review.
Regarding gfc_warning, what do you think should we do?
a) Mapping gfc_warning to gfc_warning_now as suggested in
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/fortran/2014-11/msg00141.html
or
b) Do actual buffering as in
h
15 matches
Mail list logo