Hi all:
This patch update `Bit operations` section in libgcc.text, most bit
operation function is take an unsigned integer instead of signed
integer in libgcc/libgcc2.c [1], and it seem more make sense :)
ChangeLog
2014-10-28 Kito Cheng
* doc/libgcc.texi: Update text to match implemen
> This patch has now been committed.
It breaks bootstap on x86_64-apple-darwin14:
...
make[3]: Entering directory `/opt/gcc/p_build/libcc1'
make all-am
make[4]: Entering directory `/opt/gcc/p_build/libcc1'
make[4]: *** No rule to make target `../libiberty/pic/libiberty.a', needed by
`libcc1.la'
Gentlemen!
My apologies for the big patch. In getting locals emitted early
(parameters and locally scoped variables), I ran into many things which
were in need of surgery, many of which couldn't happen without the
other. Consequently, I ended up fixing everything such that we are now
back t
Hi Matthew,
Review comments are attached. I will tackle the R6 patch next.
Thanks,
Catherine
> -Original Message-
> From: Matthew Fortune [mailto:matthew.fort...@imgtec.com]
> Sent: Friday, August 22, 2014 5:43 AM
> To: 'gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org' (gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org); Eric Christopher
Richi,
The bootstrap with an empty match.pd seems to be succeeding. I don't
know if you have disabled optimizations in other passes that now are
implemented in genmatch. Regular testing of AIX is important to
discover bootstrap issues early and avoid more release blocking
issues.
AIX and PPC64
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:44 PM, Moore, Catherine
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pins...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 6:41 PM
>> To: Moore, Catherine
>> Cc: Steve Ellcey; Matthew Fortune; GCC Patches
>> Subject: Re: [Patch] Add MIPS flag to
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pins...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 6:41 PM
> To: Moore, Catherine
> Cc: Steve Ellcey; Matthew Fortune; GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [Patch] Add MIPS flag to avoid use of ldc1/sdc1/ldxc1/sdxc1
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:
New command-line options need documenting in invoke.texi.
--
Joseph S. Myers
jos...@codesourcery.com
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:35 PM, Moore, Catherine
wrote:
>
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pins...@gmail.com]
>> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 6:32 PM
>> To: Steve Ellcey
>> Cc: Moore, Catherine; Matthew Fortune; GCC Patches
>> Subject: Re: [Patch] Add MIPS flag to
On Mon, 2014-10-27 at 15:32 -0700, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
> >
> > There are some MIPS patches that have been applied to the Google Android GCC
> > tree but not been submitted to FSF GCC. I would like to get those patches
> > checked in if possi
> -Original Message-
> From: Andrew Pinski [mailto:pins...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, October 27, 2014 6:32 PM
> To: Steve Ellcey
> Cc: Moore, Catherine; Matthew Fortune; GCC Patches
> Subject: Re: [Patch] Add MIPS flag to avoid use of ldc1/sdc1/ldxc1/sdxc1
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:
On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 3:23 PM, Steve Ellcey wrote:
>
> There are some MIPS patches that have been applied to the Google Android GCC
> tree but not been submitted to FSF GCC. I would like to get those patches
> checked in if possible. The first one is to add a new MIPS flag to turn
> off the u
There are some MIPS patches that have been applied to the Google Android GCC
tree but not been submitted to FSF GCC. I would like to get those patches
checked in if possible. The first one is to add a new MIPS flag to turn
off the use of ldc1/sdc1/ldxc1/sdxc1. Google Earth has a custom allocat
On Friday 2014-10-24 16:49, Jason Merrill wrote:
> OK. Gerald, were you thinking of specific software that would be
> affected by this change?
I do not recall which pieces I had in mind back then.
In general I did make the experience (updating the GCC ports for
FreeBSD) that there is a lot o
No so much preamble for this one since cgraph.h is already
representative of only things in cgraph.c. So this is mostly shuffling
of include files.
One short 'interesting' patch, and a couple of longer boring mechanical
ones.
symbol_table::initialize() was moved to cgraph.c. The use of TD
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 57/89] Concretize parameter to gimple_call_copy_skip_args
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01213.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/201
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 18/89] Concretize get_loop_exit_condition et al to working on
gimple_cond
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01215.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK when prerequisites have gone in.
> Actually that's true f
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 52/89] Make gimple_phi_arg_edge require a gimple_phi
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01228.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> Fine once prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00877.ht
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 17/89] Update various expressions within tree-scalar-evolution.c to be
gimple_phi
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01150.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK when prerequisites have gone in.
> Actually that'
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 34/89] Introduce gimple_omp_atomic_load
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01155.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK with expected changes due to renaming/updates to const handling.
> Please repost the final p
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 67/89] Make gimple_phi_arg_location require a gimple_phi.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01182.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/ms
gcc/ChangeLog.gimple-classes:
* gimple.h (struct gdebug): Remove out-of-date references to
typedefs.
(struct ggoto): Likewise.
(struct glabel): Likewise.
---
gcc/ChangeLog.gimple-classes | 7 +++
gcc/gimple.h | 18 +++---
2 files cha
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 26/89] Introduce gimple_eh_filter
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01220.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK after fixing up the naming/const stuff as discussed for prior
> patches.
> That applies to 22-30.
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 31/89] Use subclasses of gimple in various places
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01171.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once any prerequisites are in and any renaming done.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 28/89] Introduce gimple_eh_else
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01156.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK after fixing up the naming/const stuff as discussed for prior
> patches.
> That applies to 22-30. Ma
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 55/89] Use gimple_call for callgraph edges
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01221.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00867.html
gcc/
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 78/89] Concretize gimple_call_set_nothrow
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01184.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00837.ht
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 54/89] Make gimple_call_return_slot_opt_p require a gimple_call.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01230.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patc
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 09/89] Introduce gimple_phi_iterator
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01219.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00630.html
g
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 08/89] Introduce gimple_phi and use it in various places
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01211.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> Same as prior patches in this set. Just get the const/renaming stuff
> address
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 64/89] Concretize gimple_try_set_catch_is_cleanup
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01181.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK after prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/ms
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 20/89] Introduce gimple_call
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01157.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once the const/renaming changes are done.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00633.html
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 50/89] Make gimple_phi_arg_set_location require a gimple_phi
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01163.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 32/89] Introduce gimple_try
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01214.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once const and associated renaming stuff is fixed.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg0063
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 61/89] Concretize gimple_call_use_set and gimple_call_clobber_set
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01223.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pat
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 46/89] tree-parloops.c: Use gimple_phi in various places
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01168.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 83/89] Concretize gimple_call_set_tail and gimple_call_tail_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01172.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg0
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 12/89] tree-predcom.c: use gimple_phi in various places
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01229.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK when prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 23/89] Introduce gimple_asm
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01234.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK after fixing up the naming/const stuff as discussed for prior
> patches.
> That applies to 22-30. Make s
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 38/89] Introduce gimple_omp_for
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01225.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK with expected changes due to renaming/updates to const handling.
> Please repost the final patch for
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 58/89] Make gimple_label_set_label require a gimple_label
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01164.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/201
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 82/89] Concretize gimple_call_set_fntype
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01187.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> This is fine once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/ms
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 43/89] Introduce gimple_omp_target
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01201.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK with expected changes due to renaming/updates to const handling.
> Please repost the final patch
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 49/89] Make add_phi_arg require a gimple_phi
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01162.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> Fine once prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00876.html
gcc/
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 37/89] Introduce gimple_omp_critical
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01158.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK with expected changes due to renaming/updates to const handling.
> Please repost the final patc
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 48/89] Make gimple_phi_arg_def_ptr and gimple_phi_arg_has_location
require a gimple_phi
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01197.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https:/
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 62/89] Concretize gimple_label_label
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01210.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00878.html
gcc/
*
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 66/89] Make gimple_phi_arg_location_from_edge require a gimple_phi
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01199.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-pat
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 69/89] Make gimple_cond_set_{true|false}_label require gimple_cond.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01198.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-p
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 13/89] tree-ssa-phiprop.c: use gimple_phi
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01235.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK when prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00622.ht
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 44/89] Introduce gimple_omp_teams
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01231.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK with expected changes due to renaming/updates to const handling.
> Please repost the final patch f
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 14/89] tree-ssa-loop-niter.c: use gimple_phi in a few places
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01191.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK when prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 80/89] Tweak to gimplify_modify_expr
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01189.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00842.html
g
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 11/89] tree-parloops.c: use gimple_phi in various places
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01149.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK when prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 60/89] Concretize gimple_catch_types
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01195.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00816.html
g
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 36/89] Introduce gimple_omp_continue
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01205.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK with expected changes due to renaming/updates to const handling.
> Please repost the final patc
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 39/89] Introduce gimple_omp_parallel
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01159.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK with expected changes due to renaming/updates to const handling.
> Please repost the final patc
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 25/89] Introduce gimple_catch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01178.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK after fixing up the naming/const stuff as discussed for prior
> patches.
> That applies to 22-30. Make
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 16/89] tree-ssa-loop-ivopts.c: use gimple_phi in a few places
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01165.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK when prerequisites have gone in.
> Actually that's true for #17 & #18
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 30/89] Introduce gimple_eh_dispatch
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01236.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK after fixing up the naming/const stuff as discussed for prior
> patches.
> That applies to 22-30
This commit requires the automated renaming that follows in order to
compile; I'm keeping it separate since the former is hand-written,
whereas the latter is autogenerated.
gcc/ChangeLog.gimple-classes:
* coretypes.h (gimple_cond): Drop this typedef.
(const_gimple_cond): Likewise.
Hi!
The following testcase is miscompiled in 4.8+ on x86_64 at -O2+,
because REE widens for ZERO_EXTEND mode on
(set (reg:QI ax) (const_int -1)) instruction to SImode, but doesn't
adjust REG_EQUAL note of (const_int -1) also to (const_int 0xff)
like it changes the pattern.
The following patch att
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 87/89] Use gimple_call in some places within tree-ssa-dom.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01173.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK when prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg008
This patch is huge (704K), so I've trimmed it.
The most pertinent data from the ChangeLog is:
Patch autogenerated by rename_gimple_subclasses.py from
https://github.com/davidmalcolm/gcc-refactoring-scripts
revision 7d754b63ff2bf47226a67b2c0af5d74b54d4709f
The full patch c
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 86/89] Concretize gimple_call_copy_flags and ipa_modify_call_arguments
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01175.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK when prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/201
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 76/89] Concretize gimple_cond_{lhs|rhs}_ptr
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01170.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK when prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00851.html
gcc/
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 74/89] Concretize gimple_cond_set_code
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01209.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> Fine once prerequisites go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00849.html
gcc/
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 79/89] Concretize gimple_call_nothrow_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01204.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00844.html
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 70/89] Concretize locals within expand_omp_for_init_counts
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01183.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/20
Various variables have names that confuse my subclass renaming
script. Rename them now to simplify the mass-renaming.
gcc/ChangeLog.gimple-classes:
* tree-inline.h (struct copy_body_data): Rename field
"gimple_call" to "call_stmt".
* gimplify.c (gimplify_bind_expr): Renam
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 85/89] Concretize gimple_assign_nontemporal_move_p
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01202.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK when prereqs have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00853
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 65/89] Concretize three gimple_try_set_ accessors
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01167.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg
gcc/ChangeLog.gimple-classes:
* doc/gimple.texi (Class hierarchy of GIMPLE statements): Update
to reflect the new gimple subclasses and the renamings of existing
classes.
---
gcc/ChangeLog.gimple-classes | 6
gcc/doc/gimple.texi | 79 +
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 53/89] More gimple_phi
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01200.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> Ok once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00812.html
gcc/
*
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 84/89] Concretize gimple_call_arg_flags
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01186.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> This is fine, but will need tweaking once the const changes go in. The
> final form is approved
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 88/89] Use gimple_phi in many more places.
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01176.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> Fine once prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00879.html
This p
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 77/89] Concretize various expressions from gimple to gimple_cond
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01196.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/m
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 72/89] Concretize gimple_switch_index and gimple_switch_index_ptr
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01185.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prereqs go in and will obviously need updating for const
> ch
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 82/89] Concretize gimple_call_set_fntype
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01187.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> This is fine once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/ms
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 89/89] Convert various gimple to gimple_phi within ssa-iterators.h
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01177.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prereq go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 75/89] Concretize gimple_cond_set_{lhs|rhs}
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01222.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00850.html
gcc/
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 73/89] Concretize gimple_cond_{true|false}_label
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01169.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg0
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 71/89] Concretize gimple_cond_make_{false|true}
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01208.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00863.htm
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 68/89] Concretize three gimple_return_ accessors
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01233.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> Fine once prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00865.html
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 63/89] Concretize gimple_eh_filter_set_types and
gimple_eh_filter_set_failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01166.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.o
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 42/89] Introduce gimple_omp_single
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01206.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK with expected changes due to renaming/updates to const handling.
> Please repost the final patch
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 59/89] Make gimple_goto_set_dest require a gimple_goto
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01193.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-0
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 56/89] Various gimple to gimple_call conversions in IPA
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01179.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-05/msg00857.h
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 51/89] Update GRAPHITE to use more concrete gimple statement classes
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01212.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prereqs go in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 47/89] omp-low.c: Use more concrete types of gimple statement for
various locals
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01203.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK once prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gn
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 45/89] Introduce gimple_omp_sections
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01188.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK with expected changes due to renaming/updates to const handling.
> Please repost the final patc
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 33/89] Use more concrete types for various gimple statements
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01226.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK after prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 41/89] Introduce gimple_omp_task
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01160.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK with expected changes due to renaming/updates to const handling.
> Please repost the final patch fo
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 40/89] tree-cfg.c: Make verify_gimple_call require a gimple_call
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01232.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK when prerequisites have gone in.
in https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patc
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 35/89] Introduce gimple_omp_atomic_store
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01227.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK with expected changes due to renaming/updates to const handling.
> Please repost the final
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 29/89] Introduce gimple_resx
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01161.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK after fixing up the naming/const stuff as discussed for prior
> patches.
> That applies to 22-30. Make
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 24/89] Introduce gimple_transaction
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01207.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK after fixing up the naming/const stuff as discussed for prior
> patches.
> That applies to 22-30
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 21/89] Introduce gimple_return
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01180.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK after fixing up the naming/const stuff as discussed for prior
> patches.
> That applies to 22-30. Mak
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 27/89] Introduce gimple_eh_must_not_throw
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01218.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK after fixing up the naming/const stuff as discussed for prior
> patches.
> That applies to
This corresponds to:
[PATCH 22/89] Introduce gimple_goto
https://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2014-04/msg01174.html
from the original 89-patch kit
That earlier patch was approved by Jeff:
> OK after fixing up the naming/const stuff as discussed for prior
> patches.
> That applies to 22-30. Make
1 - 100 of 189 matches
Mail list logo