On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 12-08-12 16:16 , Steven Bosscher wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Diego Novillo
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> This patch implements the configuration changes needed to
>>> bootstrap with a C++ compiler by default.
>>
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Is
Hello Yunfeng,
Thank you for following up, and sorry for me reviewing your patches so
lately. The libcpp changes are coming along nicely, IMHO. I like the
fact that they are getting pretty minimal. I just have a few mostly
cosmetic comments at this point.
[...]
> diff -cpr .pc/symdb_enhance_l
Diego -
>>> * doc/gty.texi: Document support for C++ templates and
>>> user-provided markers.
>>
>>
>> The 1st node in this doc file needs s/C/C++/g and perhaps some more
>> explanation with an eye on C++.
>
>
> Sorry. I'm not sure what you are trying to say here.
I'm referring
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 5:27 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> On 12-08-12 18:38 , H.J. Lu wrote:
>>
>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 3:33 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
>>>
>>> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Diego Novillo
>>> wrote:
I will be sending 6 patches that implement all the changes we
have bee
On 12-08-12 16:40 , Andreas Schwab wrote:
Diego Novillo writes:
diff --git a/gcc/gdbinit.in b/gcc/gdbinit.in
index d1ae46d..858e490 100644
--- a/gcc/gdbinit.in
+++ b/gcc/gdbinit.in
@@ -182,6 +182,17 @@ document pbm
Dump the bitmap that is in $ as a comma-separated list of numbers.
end
+#
On 12-08-12 16:56 , Gerald Pfeifer wrote:
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
ChangeLog
2012-08-12 Diego Novillo
* Makefile.in (CXX_FOR_BUILD): Define.
(BUILD_CXX_FLAGS): Define
(COMPILER_FOR_BUILD): Set to CXX_FOR_BUILD if building with C++.
(LINKER_FO
On 12-08-12 16:16 , Steven Bosscher wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
This patch implements the configuration changes needed to
bootstrap with a C++ compiler by default.
Hi,
Is it possible to add -fno-rtti to the default CXX_FLAGS, and remove
it if necessary?
I
On 12-08-12 16:57 , Marc Glisse wrote:
other compiler that managed. IBM and Oracle both fail (the comment is
not clear, but I think 12.3 also fails, just not exactly in the same
way), and HP and Intel (to mention just a few) are not listed.
We should fix/workaround failing host C++ compilers s
On 12-08-12 18:38 , H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 3:33 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
I will be sending 6 patches that implement all the changes we
have been making on the cxx-conversion branch. As described in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012
On Sat, 4 Aug 2012, Sandra Loosemore wrote:
>> And http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-4.8/changes.html :-)
> Eh, this is pretty trivial compared to some of the other MIPS
> improvements that are either recently committed or in the pipeline --
> specifically, the microMIPS support Catherine is working on, and
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 3:33 PM, H.J. Lu wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
>> I will be sending 6 patches that implement all the changes we
>> have been making on the cxx-conversion branch. As described in
>> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-08/msg00015.html, these pat
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> I will be sending 6 patches that implement all the changes we
> have been making on the cxx-conversion branch. As described in
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-08/msg00015.html, these patches
> change the default bootstrap process so that st
Hello,
This patch tried to use non-clearing memory allocation where possible.
This is especially important for very large functions, when arrays of
size in the order of n_basic_blocks or num_ssa_names are allocated to
hold sparse data sets. For such cases the overhead of memset becomes
measurable
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
This implements the double_int rewrite.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg00711.html for
details.
Diego.
I am taking it as a chance to ask a couple questions about the coding
conventions.
2012-08-12 Lawrence Crowl
* hash
Oleg Endo wrote:
> This adds some patters that allow the combine pass to catch inverted
> compare and branch opportunities better.
>
> Tested on rev 190273 with
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
>
> and no new fai
Oleg Endo wrote:
> I've noticed that __builtin_prefetch was not working on SH3, although
> the pref instruction is available on SH3. Also, it seems that some of
> the checks in the prefetch expander are redundant.
> Tested on rev 190273 with
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> \
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
For those who would like to build the conversion, you can either
checkout the branch from SVN
(svn://gcc.gnu.org/gcc/branches/cxx-conversion) or get the merged
trunk I have in the git repo (branch dnovillo/cxx-conversion).
The bootstrap changes have alr
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Diego Novillo wrote:
> ChangeLog
> 2012-08-12 Diego Novillo
>
> * Makefile.in (CXX_FOR_BUILD): Define.
> (BUILD_CXX_FLAGS): Define
> (COMPILER_FOR_BUILD): Set to CXX_FOR_BUILD if building with C++.
> (LINKER_FOR_BUILD): Likewise.
> (BUILD_COMP
Diego Novillo writes:
> diff --git a/gcc/gdbinit.in b/gcc/gdbinit.in
> index d1ae46d..858e490 100644
> --- a/gcc/gdbinit.in
> +++ b/gcc/gdbinit.in
> @@ -182,6 +182,17 @@ document pbm
> Dump the bitmap that is in $ as a comma-separated list of numbers.
> end
>
> +# Define some macros helpful t
This implements support for calling tree macros from gdb.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg00711.html for
details.
Diego.
2012-08-12 Lawrence Crowl
* tree.h (tree_check): New.
(TREE_CHECK): Use inline function above instead of __extension__.
(tree_no
On Sun, Aug 12, 2012 at 10:09 PM, Diego Novillo wrote:
> This patch implements the configuration changes needed to
> bootstrap with a C++ compiler by default.
Hi,
Is it possible to add -fno-rtti to the default CXX_FLAGS, and remove
it if necessary?
Ciao!
Steven
This patch implements the configuration changes needed to
bootstrap with a C++ compiler by default.
See http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-08/msg00711.html for
details.
Diego.
ChangeLog
2012-08-12 Diego Novillo
* Makefile.in (CXX_FOR_BUILD): Define.
(BUILD_CXX_FLAGS): D
I will be sending 6 patches that implement all the changes we
have been making on the cxx-conversion branch. As described in
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2012-08/msg00015.html, these patches
change the default bootstrap process so that stage 1 always
builds with a C++ compiler.
Other than the boots
On 08/11/2012 03:47 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
On Sat, 11 Aug 2012, François Dumont wrote:
Your remark on using std::move rather than std::forward Marc made
sens but didn't work. I don't understand why but the new test is
showing that std::forward works. If anyone can explain why std::move
doe
On Sun, Jul 01, 2012 at 09:33:06AM -0500, Gabriel Dos Reis wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 28, 2012 at 12:50 PM, Sterling Augustine
> wrote:
> > The enclosed patch adds a fix for the pubnames anonymous namespaces
> > contained
> > within named namespaces, and adds an extensive test for the various
> > pubn
This improves the fairly uninformative "Operation not supported"
message given when std::thread is used without linking to libpthread.
Now you get:
terminate called after throwing an instance of 'std::system_error'
what(): Enable multithreading to use std::thread: Operation not permitted
Abort
Hello,
This fixes some of the FPU related SH target test cases, which are not
skipped / not skipped appropriately.
Tested with
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="sh.exp --target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2e/-mb,/-m2e/-ml,-m3/-mb,-m3/-ml,-m3e/-mb,-m3e/-mb,
-m2a/-mb,-m2a-single-only/-mb,-m4/-ml,
Hello,
This fixes some of the FPU related SH target test cases, which are not
skipped / not skipped appropriately.
Tested with
make -k check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="sh.exp --target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2e/-mb,/-m2e/-ml,-m3/-mb,-m3/-ml,-m3e/-mb,-m3e/-mb,
-m2a/-mb,-m2a-single-only/-mb,-m4/-ml,
On Sat, Aug 11, 2012 at 10:37 PM, Marc Glisse wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'll have to retest this patch tomorrow (although I don't expect the
> modified code is ever called), for some reason the testsuite took twice as
> long as usual to run and showed some weird stuff tonight.
>
> There doesn't seem to
Hello,
I've noticed that __builtin_prefetch was not working on SH3, although
the pref instruction is available on SH3. Also, it seems that some of
the checks in the prefetch expander are redundant.
Tested on rev 190273 with
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/
Hello,
This adds some patters that allow the combine pass to catch inverted
compare and branch opportunities better.
Tested on rev 190273 with
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
and no new failures.
OK?
PS: I'm still
Oleg Endo wrote:
> This patch fixes ICEs such as reported in the PR due to wrong predicate
> matching and adds test cases for those.
> Tested on rev 190273 with
> make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
> \{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
>
> and no new fail
Hello,
This patch fixes ICEs such as reported in the PR due to wrong predicate
matching and adds test cases for those.
Tested on rev 190273 with
make -k check RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=sh-sim
\{-m2/-ml,-m2/-mb,-m2a/-mb,-m4/-ml,-m4/-mb,-m4a/-ml,-m4a/-mb}"
and no new failures.
OK?
Cheers,
Oleg
On Sun, 12 Aug 2012, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
On 11 August 2012 14:47, Marc Glisse wrote:
What testcase failed? I just tried the 2.cc file you added with the patch,
and replacing forward(__k) with move(__k) compiled fine.
Shouldn't it be std::move(__k) to disable ADL though?
It is written st
On 11 August 2012 14:47, Marc Glisse wrote:
>
> What testcase failed? I just tried the 2.cc file you added with the patch,
> and replacing forward(__k) with move(__k) compiled fine.
Shouldn't it be std::move(__k) to disable ADL though?
On 12/08/2012 10:56, Tobias Burnus wrote:
> Build and regtested on x86-64-linux.
> OK for the trunk?
OK.
> 2012-08-11 Tobias Burnus
>
> PR fortran/54221
> * vect/vect-gems.f90: Don't mark module vars as PRIVATE as
> they appear (ninitialized on the RHS.
Thank you Uros, Richard!
I will confirm the test results in couple off days.
Regards
Ganesh
-Original Message-
From: Uros Bizjak [mailto:ubiz...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 11, 2012 3:54 AM
To: Richard Henderson
Cc: Gopalasubramanian, Ganesh; gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org
Subject: Re: [
2012/8/11 Georg-Johann Lay :
> Weddington, Eric schrieb:
>>>
>>> From: Georg-Johann Lay
>>>
>>>
>>> The first step would be to bisect and find the patch that lead to
>>> PR53923. It was not a change in the avr BE, so the question goes
>>> to the authors of the respective patch.
>>>
>>> Up to now I
Since April, gfortran no longer marks module procedures/variables as
TREE_PUBLIC, if they are marked as PRIVATE. (-> improved optimization,
reduced file size)
However, as this PR shows, for "PRIVATE" instead of "PRIVATE :: symbol"
this didn't work, which is addressed by the attached patch.
I
39 matches
Mail list logo
