Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] gcc110 performance problems

2016-12-04 Thread Segher Boessenkool
[ Sean: don't send html email, please. It is hard to read and harder to reply to ] On Sun, Dec 04, 2016 at 02:28:01PM -0500, Douglas Katzman wrote: > isn't it as simple as that user 'segher' is running a highly parallelized > build of something? gcc, I believe. > $ ps auxw|grep cc1plus|wc -l > 56

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] gcc110 performance problems

2016-12-04 Thread Douglas Katzman
isn't it as simple as that user 'segher' is running a highly parallelized build of something? gcc, I believe. $ ps auxw|grep cc1plus|wc -l 56 On Sun, Dec 4, 2016 at 2:08 PM, Sean McGovern wrote: > Hi, > > Can anyone tell me why gcc110's load is still extremely high after so long? > > It's gotten

[Gcc-cfarm-users] gcc110 performance problems

2016-12-04 Thread Sean McGovern
Hi,Can anyone tell me why gcc110's load is still extremely high after so long?It's gotten so bad that my test suites are now experiencing things like vfork() failuresIs there a plan to remedy this issue soon? I'm imagining it will involve a system reboot.