On 2015-04-28 15:31:50 -0700, Paul Hargrove wrote:
> Since most of us probably use Linux or OSX on x86-64 every day, this is not
> "diverse" for some of us (though I know our definitions of "diverse" will
> differ).
Indeed I was using CFarm mainly for non x86-64/Linux machines.
> So, I want to as
On 2014-05-13 15:03:48 +0200, Daniel Ortiz wrote:
> dumb or not, I think that the ServerAliveInterval option solves the problem
> mentioned by Jonathan without changing the way in which he does things.
I noticed in the past that ServerAliveInterval alone had a drawback:
in case of temporary networ
On 2012-08-27 12:14:26 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Maybe I'm being paranoid but I don't like the idea of sharing a box
> with an arbitrary number of strangers who all have root access to the
> box.
Anyway with only one user on the VM (farmuser), there isn't much
difference.
--
Vincent Lefèvr
On 2012-01-30 03:37:04 +0100, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 2012-01-29 20:22:16 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> > In order to provide a more recent and useful OpenBSD/sparc64
> > environment, I've upgraded gcc64 to OpenBSD 5.0.
> > http://gna.org/support/?286
Hi,
On 2012-01-29 20:22:16 +0100, Matthieu Herrb wrote:
> In order to provide a more recent and useful OpenBSD/sparc64
> environment, I've upgraded gcc64 to OpenBSD 5.0.
> http://gna.org/support/?2866
There were no problems to build GNU MPFR 3.1.0-p4 on OpenBSD 4.6.
But after the upgrade, 6 test
On 2010-03-09 17:38:47 +0100, Paul Zimmermann wrote:
> > Curiously, sizeof(long double) is 16 on this Gentoo system (for -m32, the
> > default) whereas it's 8 on the Debian system (gcc54)
>
> this is indeed strange. With -m64 (which is what is used by mpfr-2.4.2 when
> one compiles it with a recen
