Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] Compiler Farm Access?

On Mon, Mar 27, 2017 at 12:02 AM, Toebs Douglass wrote: > On 26/03/17 23:55, Don Bright wrote: >> It was good while it lasted. Thanks for the memories. And the memory. and >> disk space. and cpu cycles. and network bandwidth. and power usage. and >> administration. >> >> long live gcc farm. > > I

[Gcc-cfarm-users] gcc22: root file system full

There is no space free on gcc22 to compile even a simple "hello world" program: stefan@erpro8-fsf1:~/temp$ gcc c.c c.c:7:1: fatal error: error closing /tmp/ccFc7XvK.s: No space left on device compilation terminated. The problem is caused by these directories in /tmp: drwxr-xr-x 4 muller muller

[Gcc-cfarm-users] aarch64 machines down (gcc113-116)

What happened to the wonderful aarch64 machines? Any update on when they will be back again? ___ Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm-users

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] postgres on gcc112

On Wed, Feb 10, 2016 at 4:44 AM, Noah Misch wrote: > Killing them was the right decision. Thank you. Like all my cfarm batch > testing, the processes had setpriority(PRIO_MAX). Perhaps I/O load remained > high enough to ruin things. Unfortunately, process priority is absolutely worthless on ma

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] gcc110 fedora update

On Fri, Oct 9, 2015 at 11:01 AM, Laurent GUERBY wrote: > Hi, > > We'll upgrade gcc110 fedora version over the week-end starting saturday > morning. So, powerpc (32bit) binaries do not work anymore because architecture binaries are no longer provided by Fedora? This is very unfortunate. There does

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] gcc33/34/35/37/42/45/51/52 offline

> We're moving gcc33/34/35/37/42/45/51/52 to a new > hosting facility, we hope to have everything > back online mid august. Any news on this? Thanks Stefan ___ Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org https://mail.gna.org/listinfo/gcc-cfarm