Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] gcc31: Skipping incompatible mpfr library?

2008-09-16 Thread Roman Rybalko
gt; Any ideas? > may be /opt/cfarm/mpfr-2.3.1/lib/libmpfr.a contains an object for another arch, or you're trying to compile with incorrect --target just a guess -- WBR, Roman Rybalko ___ Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.org

[Gcc-cfarm-users] gcc17 is down

2008-06-16 Thread Roman Rybalko
Hi, What's up with gcc17? I see it's down for a week already. It's sad that such multi-proc-multi-core box is down :'-( I'm sure there is watchdog. Laurent, may be you might set it up? -- WBR, Roman Rybalko ___ Gcc-cfarm-use

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] Wish-list - debhelper and fakeroot packages

2008-05-23 Thread Roman Rybalko
NightStrike wrote: > On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 12:27 PM, Arthur Loiret <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> On Thu, May 22, 2008 at 06:29:32PM +0400, Roman Rybalko wrote: >> >>> Yeah, Alpha is a good stuff :P >>> >>> How about software?

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] Wish-list (old: Dual Alpha EV56 machine available in the compile farm)

2008-05-22 Thread Roman Rybalko
I need to my home directory, but there is a problem with debhelper - it contains absolute paths and it's quite complicated to launch it from /home/user.. "fakeroot" would be also appreciated ;) Thanks a lot -- WBR, Roman Rybalko ___

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] switching nodes

2008-05-19 Thread Roman Rybalko
Laurent GUERBY wrote: > On Mon, 2008-05-19 at 13:29 +0400, Roman Rybalko wrote: > >> Switching nodes? >> How about: >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# tar jcv . | nc gcc17 34345 >> [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~# nc -l -p 34345 | tar jxv >> Can I copy 300M gcc14 -> gcc

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] switching nodes

2008-05-19 Thread Roman Rybalko
> the outright abuse of the 30+ users with access to it. Maybe we can > connect all the nodes' home directories with nfs to allow easy > switching of nodes? My 2 cents. > > ~Robert Eckhoff -- WBR, Roman Rybalko ___ Gcc-cfarm-us

[Gcc-cfarm-users] gcc torture tests, that take down all gcc14 for a hour 4 times a day or more

2008-05-18 Thread Roman Rybalko
e the test just eats memory and doesn't use it then. Since there is better to do actual work instead of doing HDD throughput tests. May be some "patch" needed? -- WBR, Roman Rybalko BTG Project http://btg.berlios.de/ ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/btg/