Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] Compile Farm Project

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 1:22 PM, Pierre-Yves David wrote: > > > On 10/10/2014 10:17 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: >> >> All: also, regarding appreciating IBM's machine donations, IBM >> people (IIRC, for example David E. and Bill S.) have at times >> expressed that they'd be helped by emails expre

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] Compile Farm Project

On Fri, 10 Oct 2014, Pierre-Yves David wrote: > On 10/10/2014 10:17 AM, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > All: also, regarding appreciating IBM's machine donations, IBM > > people (IIRC, for example David E. and Bill S.) have at times > > expressed that they'd be helped by emails expressing how > > dif

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] Compile Farm Project

Likewise, Concurrency Kit would only support x86* if it wasn't for this project. Thanks much! I do hope we can find a way to bring back SPARCv9+, MIPS and ARM and if there is any way I can help with that in specific, please let me know. On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 12:11 PM, FX wrote: > Hi Laurent, >

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] Compile Farm Project

Hi Laurent, I’m no longer active as user, but I (and the rest of the gfortran team) really benefitted from the project in the days when it started. Thanks to everyone who makes this possible! FX ___ Gcc-cfarm-users mailing list Gcc-cfarm-users@gna.

[Gcc-cfarm-users] Compile Farm Project

Hi, The compile farm project is run entirely by volunteers under the FSF France umbrella who try to: 1/ get machines donated from vendors 2/ find free hosting for the donated machines 3/ install and do minimal adminsys on the machines once in the farm Many people and organizations have contrib

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] Is there a mips(64)el box?

Le Thursday 09 October 2014 à 12:11 +0100, Alan Lawrence a écrit : > https://gcc.gnu.org/wiki/CompileFarm lists gcc49 at tetaneutral.net as having > a > public IP, but I'm unable to resolve gcc49.tetaneutral.net or > gcc49.fsffrance.org (or gcc49 from e.g. gcc20.fsffrance.org or > gcc45.fsffran

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] Is there a mips(64)el box?

> My impression is that it would be preferable to have fewer machines in the farm, but concentrate on providing at least one reliable, fast implementation of each of MIPS, PPC and ARM (32 and 64 bit in all cases). +1 Christian - Message d'origine - De : "(Torbjörn Granlund)"

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] Is there a mips(64)el box?

Julian Seward writes: The Power7 machine is also useful for Valgrind support. Without it it would be more difficult to maintain the ppc64 Valgrind port. Let's really hope IBM maintains these machines for the community use even as this Compile Farm shrinks. We should remind IBM that we ap

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] Is there a mips(64)el box?

On Fri, Oct 10, 2014 at 9:38 AM, Torbjörn Granlund wrote: > Apart from that most machines are now offline, the list of presumably > online machines is not correct; about half of those machines are gone > since months or years. (E.g., gcc49 seems to have disappeared in August > 2013, gcc45 seems

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] Is there a mips(64)el box?

On 10/10/2014 00:34, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > On Thursday, October 09 2014, Philippe Waroquiers wrote: > >> I would welcome the revival of the mips and arm systems. >> And things such as aarch64 systems, darwin, ... >> would be very helpful. > > I wonder if there is something I/we can do to

Re: [Gcc-cfarm-users] Is there a mips(64)el box?

Sergio Durigan Junior writes: It is extremely unfair to call it "mostly irrelevant". But then, I don't care if you think so, ... It would be nice if we could can have this discussion in friendly tone. Disagreement is no excuse for rudeness. The only machines which are actually alive whic