--- Comment #8 from zackw at panix dot com 2007-07-06 17:58 ---
Subject: Bug 32441
Author: zack
Date: Fri Jul 6 17:57:58 2007
New Revision: 126424
URL: http://gcc.gnu.org/viewcvs?root=gcc&view=rev&rev=126424
Log:
2007-07-06 Ian Lance Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Zack Weinb
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-18 06:42
---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-07 07:10
---
Joseph - I never properly answered your question in comment #7, although
arguably the answer is already in comment #4.
I should mention I take as a basic premise that without exception, a sequence of
UCNs and
cc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
GCC target triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19583
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23 05:08
---
Created an attachment (id=8039)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8039&action=view)
test case
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19583
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2005-01-23 05:11
---
Created an attachment (id=8040)
--> (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=8040&action=view)
shorter test case
--
What|Removed
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: rtl-optimization
AssignedTo: roger at eyesopen dot com
ReportedBy: zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC target triplet: powerpc-*-*
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 17:18 ---
(From update of attachment 7415)
fix mime type, mark as patch
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-27 17:31 ---
fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--
Bug 17265 depends on bug 18075, which changed state.
Bug 18075 Summary: [4.0 Regression] #pragma implementation broken in presence of
#pragma ident
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=18075
What|Old Value |New Value
-
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-10-28 21:01 ---
Fixed.
--
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
--
What|Removed |Added
BugsThisDependsOn||18382
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6123
oduct: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
Priority: P2
Component: c
AssignedTo: zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
ReportedBy: zack at gcc dot gnu dot org
CC: gcc-bugs at gcc dot gnu dot org
GCC targ
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-08 20:36
---
accept, set milestone.
Just to be clear, I'm not doing this until 4.1 because global changes to target
configury would be too destabilizing right now. We can live with scattershot
for one more re
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-08 20:37
---
I've filed bug 18382 for the general solution to this problem.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=6123
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-11-30 07:47
---
+kw, milestone; assigning to myself for commitment once 4.1 opens.
--
What|Removed |Added
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-04 03:38
---
The question is then why -fvisibility=hidden -Werror does not cause the compiler
to exit unsuccessfully. libgcc.mk uses that incantation to determine whether
.hidden is supported.
--
http://gcc.gnu.org
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-08 22:04
---
Uh, no, it's not fixed. It is, however, papered over adequately for 4.0. I'm
turning this into a 4.1 enhancement PR.
http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2004-12/msg00491.html explains what needs to
--- Additional Comments From zack at gcc dot gnu dot org 2004-12-08 22:05
---
... and assigning to self.
--
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|unassigned at gcc dot gnu
19 matches
Mail list logo
