,
||vgupta at synopsys dot com
--- Comment #7 from Vineet Gupta ---
FWIW this is also applicable to ARC glibc + upstream gcc 10
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-July/115679.html
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/libc-alpha/2020-July/115694.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89838
--- Comment #3 from Vineet Gupta ---
Can this be closed ?
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vgupta at synopsys dot com
CC: claziss at gcc dot gnu.org, claziss at gmail dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Test case:
int f(double x, double y
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vgupta at synopsys dot com
CC: claziss at gcc dot gnu.org, vgupta at synopsys dot com
Target Milestone: ---
This is similar to issues reported for other targets
https
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92846
--- Comment #1 from Vineet Gupta ---
Test case:
int f(double x, double y)
{
return x > y; // expected FDCMPF (qNaN, sNaN)
}
int f2(double x, double y)
{
return __builtin_isgreater(x, y); // expected FDCMP (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92846
--- Comment #2 from Vineet Gupta ---
Created attachment 47438
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=47438&action=edit
proposed fix
Ran full glibc tessuite with this: No regressions
gcc dejagnu test pr52451.c passes too
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vgupta at synopsys dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52451
--- Comment #12 from Vineet Gupta ---
oops the ARC bug is (PR 92846) not (PR 92845)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vgupta at synopsys dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
--- Comment #9 from Vineet Gupta ---
Can this be stable backported to gcc-8-branch as well.
glibc folks use that branch for their regular smoke testing and without that
ARC tools don't even build.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88001
--- Comment #11 from Vineet Gupta ---
Sure, but how can I ? if i click the "known to work" field it takes me to help.
The issue certainly with gcc-8-branch for ARC and presumably also with
tip/trunk.
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vgupta at synopsys dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 46028
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46028&action=edit
test case
An ICE was triggered when building glibc testsuite (after a glibc
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vgupta at synopsys dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 46051
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=46051&action=edit
te
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89877
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vgupta at synopsys dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89877
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89838
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92845
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92846
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
Component: c
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: vgupta at synopsys dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Created attachment 50722
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50722&action=edit
test case with an additional nop to annotate codegen
In Linux k
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100363
--- Comment #3 from Vineet Gupta ---
Created attachment 50723
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50723&action=edit
preprocessed source file (with extra nop annotation)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100363
--- Comment #6 from Vineet Gupta ---
(In reply to Linus Torvalds from comment #4)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> > The loop gets vectorized, I don't see the problem really.
>
>
> See
>
>
> https://github.com/foss-for-syno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100363
--- Comment #12 from Vineet Gupta ---
Created attachment 50742
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50742&action=edit
kernel patch as proposed on comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100363
--- Comment #13 from Vineet Gupta ---
Sorry the workaround proposed by Alexander doesn't seem to cure it (patch
attached), outcome is the same
mov lp_count,r13;5 #, bnd.65
lp @.L201 ; lp_count:@.L50->@.L201
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100363
--- Comment #15 from Vineet Gupta ---
(In reply to Linus Torvalds from comment #14)
> (In reply to Vineet Gupta from comment #13)
> > Sorry the workaround proposed by Alexander doesn't seem to cure it (patch
> > attached), outcome is the same
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100363
--- Comment #18 from Vineet Gupta ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #9)
> (In reply to Linus Torvalds from comment #8)
> > (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #7)
> > >
> > > Most likely the issue is that sout/sfrom are misal
25 matches
Mail list logo
