--- Comment #7 from urjaman at gmail dot com 2008-08-07 07:51 ---
I did a simple test on my avr-gcc 4.2.2 and it seems that this bug (i dont
think it should be Resolution: INVALID but...) is fixed in 4.2.2 atleast. I
changed the register used in the example to r2 to see if the AVR&#
--- Comment #3 from urjaman at gmail dot com 2009-04-24 20:24 ---
Confirmed on 4.3.2 - it's a bit different and actually worse (longer):
(Please add 4.3.2 to known to fail - i cant)
:
0: e8 2f mov r30, r24
2: f9 2f mov r31, r25
4:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57339
Urja Rannikko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||urjaman at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749
Urja Rannikko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||urjaman at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50749
--- Comment #22 from Urja Rannikko ---
All of the 3 pointer regs (X,Y,Z) can do post-inc operations, but only Y and Z
can do displacement (which is what gcc tries to use, even when the increment
operation would be better all around since we usual
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71151
Urja Rannikko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||urjaman at gmail dot com
--- Comment
